[jamese777]

Really? I must have missed that when did they state that? Please cite your reference to the USSC and their rejection.

---

Here are the eight Obama eligibility appeals that have been denied at the Supreme Court of the United States:
1) Berg v Obama:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2009/01/12/berg-v-obama-scotus-denies-writ-of-certiorari-before-judgment/
2) Beverly v FEC:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030110zor.pdf
The Denial notice is on page 4, 09-794
3) Craig v US:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08-10817.htm
4) Donofrio v Wells: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/12/08/supreme_court_declines_to_hear.html
5) Herbert v Obama:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6777.htm
6) Lightfoot v Bowen: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2171962/posts
7) Schneller v Cortes:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2009/06/26/schneller-v-cortes-motion-denied-writ-dismissed-with-opinion/
8) Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/08/breaking-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-obama-birth-certificate-challenge/

[rolling_stone]

you stated;

Since the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868 there are only two classifications of citizens: Citizens-at-birth and naturalized citizens. Citizens at birth can become president, naturalized citizens cannot. No court decision and no law passed by Congress has ever differentiated between a Citizen-at-birth and a Natural Born Citizen.

That is why the US Supreme Court has rejected all eight Obama eligibility appeals that have reached them.

Where in those cases did they cite your allegation? Nowhere. More deception by you.