Posted on 07/07/2010 12:23:31 AM PDT by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]
This Case is going to be such an EMBARASSMENT to the REGIME!!
I foresee another 5-4 USSC decision down the road. If I were one of the freedom 5 I’d be checking under my car and so on...
These commies are not human. They have no shame. They are possessed and driven by some evil that is beyond reasoning, much like the blood-lust of rabid animals.
I don't believe they have the capacity to reconsider -- not even when the rope snaps tight.
With due respect. Sorry, but liberal socialists are NOT "disoriented".
Websters definition:
1 a : to cause to lose bearings : displace from normal position or relationship b : to cause to lose the sense of time, place, or identity.
They have a purposefully designed ideology to forward their untenable Utopian ideals that can never work, whether through compassion or through control. Their ideology is not "disoriented". Their ideology is focused with "bearing". That's what is killing us.
Readers shoud be aware that the link, posted here under News/Activism is to a message board/blog of which the poster is the administrator.
Evidently he wants the discussion of ideas and opinions he deems newsworthy to take place somewhere other than Free Republic.
There are several links to YouTube Videos and items from Fox News and other sources, none of which could not be posted on FreeRepublic as a Vanity in Chat or a full article in Blogger/Personal, ir indeed as a simple comment in an ongoing thread.
Obozo= “Stupid is as stupid does.” You are what you do, and we all know you can’t fix stupid!!!
I see your point. But yet, they don’t have any sense period. They stubbornly click and pursue everything that is wrong (morally, ethically, spiritually, mathematically, etc.) and try and FORCE it to become right. It’s like when Albert Einstein defined insanity.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
If you look up insanity in the dictionary, you will get the definition of....
1 : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia)
Even if they are driven by, in your words, an “ideology to forward their untenable Utopian ideals that can never work,” it would still apply as insanity and thus the deranged definition would fit.
So what is your point? Does that stop the truth from becoming the truth? No!!! Obviously the discussion is not posted at the site even if it is my site. The discussion is on Free Republic.
If this is a means to discredit the content of the message (and that is why it is linked here—so word gets out more effectively), then you have failed. Otherwise, mind your own business.
This is a post about substance, and the only way to get it out is to go where people are....
The discussion is here.
Very interesting article. Thanks for posting. I did not see a Facebook share icon. Did I miss it? I would like to Facebook and Twitter it.
This is the “Excerpt Only” list.
I don’t see you on it.
These sites must be excerpted and linked only:
•abqjournal.com
•adn.com
•afp.com
•aim.org
•atimes.com
•associatedcontent.com
•awsj.com
•baltimoresun.com
•barrons.com
•barronsmag.com
•bayarea.com
•bendbulletin.com
•boston.com (www.boston.com The Boston Globe)
•boxofficemojo.com
•bsudailynews.com
•businessweek.com
•californian.com
•canadafreepress.com
•Capetimes.co.za
•careerjournal.com
•cavalierdaily.com
•chicagotribune.com
•chron.com
•cnn.com
•collegejournal.com
•crainsnewyork.com
•csmonitor.com
•ctnow.com
•daily-chronicle.com
•dailypress.com
•dallasnews.com
•dj.com
•dowjonesnews.com
•djnewswires.com
•dowjones.com
•feer.com (Far Eastern Economic Review)
•fresnobee.com
•foxnews.com
•gallup.com
•The Guardian (UK)
•gazette.net
•GCN.com
•goerie.com
•greenwichtime.com
•gwpi.net
•heraldnet.com
•holahoy.com
•ibdeditorials.com
•idahostatesman.com
•iht.com
•investors.com
•jacksonville.com (Florida-Times Union)
•janes.com
•jewishobserver-la.com
•jewishworldreview.com
•kansascity.com
•laopinion.com
•latimes.com
•livemint.com
•marketwatch.com
•mcall.com
•mercextra.com
•mercurynews.com
•modbee.com
•moneynews.com
•msn.com
•msnbc.com
•nasdaq.com
•nationalweekly.com
•nctimes.com
•newhavenregister.com
•news.com.au
•newsday.com
•newsweek.com
•nhregister.com
•nj.com
•nola.com
•nynewsday.com
•nypost.com
•nypostonline.com
•nysun.com
•nytimes.com
•ocregister.com
•opinionjournal.com
•oregonmag.com
•orlandosentinel.com
•pcworld.com
•pnj.com
•post-dispatch.com
•post-gazette.com
•postwritersgroup.com
•readexpress.com
•realclearpolitics.com
•realestatejournal.com
•rockymountainnews.com
•sacbee.com
•sacunion.com
•seattletimes.nwsource.com
•sfgate.com
•sitepoint.com
•sjmercury.com
•spectator.org
•spokesman-recorder.com
•sportsillustrated.com
•sportsillustrated.cnn.com
•si.com
•stamfordadvocate.com
•startribune.com
•startupjournal.com
•statesmanjournal.com
•sun-sentinel.com
•sunspot.net
•theatlantic.com
•thewbalchannel.com
•time.com
•timesdispatch.com
•toledoblade.com
•tribune.com
•tribune-review.com
•trivalleyherald.com
•todaysthv.com
•victorhanson.com
•washingtondispatch.com
•washingtonpost.com
•washingtontechnology.com
•washingtontimes.com
•washtimes.com
•washpostco.com
•wnd.com
•worldnetdaily.com
•worldpress.org
•wral.com
•wsj.com
•wsjbooks.com
•wsjclassroomedition.com
All McClatchy sources must be excerpted and linked.
These publishers have asked us not to allow any material at all to be posted to FR:
•altoonaherald.com
•altpressonline.com
•americanpolitics.com
•antiwar.com
•bloomberg.com
•brisbanetimes.com.au
•condenet.com
•eweek.com
•extremetech.com
•firstcoastnews.com
•gq.com
•independent.co.uk
•lowtechmagazine.com
•newyorker.com
•ohio.com
•pcmag.com
•portfolio.com
•prevention.com
•smh.com.au
•studlife.com
•stuff.co.nz
•style.com
•theage.com.au
•theonion.com
•thetowntalk.com
•
•tucsoncitizen.com
•universitystar.com
•vanityfair.com
•
•vogue.com
•wired.com
Same with me. If the blogger can’t post his stuff here in it’s entirety, then I won’t click on their blog.
This post is about illegal immigration and Arizona. The link clearly defines where it comes from. I am not familiar with a technicalities list, but, the list clearly defines which outlets are SAFE to excerpt from, and which media outlets FORBID excerpting from.
I am posting an article about something that is true that people need to know about. If people link to the article, they link to the Free Republic page, not mine.
Also, If you are a liberal, then please, come out and say it. Or if you are a McCain-type truth suppressor, and want to stifle out anybody that takes the Sarah Palin approach and tells it like it is, then please say so.
My site is a media site, and I am a certified broadcaster approved by the Illinois Broadcasters Association. When I link to my site, I have the wiggle room to modify or delete old posts if I have to. Either way, the link remains the same. I also cannot hyperlink on Free Republic, but on the site, I can provide links to take you directly to the backup sources. You are suggesting a self-serving conspiracy, when it is not.
The New New Deal By Charles R. Kesler
Adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College on February 1, 2010, during a four-day conference on “The New Deal,” co-sponsored by the Center for Constructive Alternatives and the Ludwig von Mises Lecture Series.
EXCERPT Unlike most Americans, President Obama still bristles at any suggestion that our nation is better or even luckier than other nations. To be blunt, he despises the notion that Americans consider themselves special among the peoples of the world. This strikes him as the worst sort of ignorance and ethnocentrism, which is why it was so difficult for him to decide to wear an American flag lapel pin when he started running for president, even though he knew it was political suicide to refuse wearing it.
As President Obama hinted in his Berlin speech during the campaign, he really thinks of himself as a multiculturalist, as a citizen of the world, first, and only incidentally as an American. To put it differently, he regards patriotism as morally and intellectually inferior to cosmopolitanism.
And, of course, he is never so much a citizen of the world as when defending the world’s environment against mankind’s depredations, and perhaps especially America’s depredations.
In general, the emotionalist defense of the earth—think of Al Gore—is now a vital part of the liberalism of our day. It’s a kind of substitute for earlier liberals’ belief in progress.
Although his own election—and secondarily liberalism’s achievements over the past century or so—help to redeem America in his view, Obama remains, in many ways, profoundly disconnected from his own land.
REST HERE http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp
You are correct. If you were not, an Almighty and Soverign God would not have to send anyone to eternal Hell.
You are pimping your blog. Get over yourself.
This belongs in Bloggers/Personal
It's your blog - why didn't you post the whole piece on FR? Because you want us to go to your blog.
Gee.
I guess I’m not the only one that has a problem with your self-excerpting.
By the way, you have completely misconstrued what the excerpt list is for. Excerpts were (and should be) the exception to the rule. The list is of sources who forbid publishing more than an excerpt, and sources who forbid any publication at all. (Link only.)
You are not on the list, therefore there is no reason for you not to post all your content.
(And please, no more red herrings about “Liberal” or McCain and Palin. I never mentioned anything like that.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.