Well, that wouldn't apply. There is absolutely no "satire" or "parody" involved.
The Dims' entire point is that Angle is (supposedly) "scrubbing" her previous views and endorsements in her new website. So their explicit and stated purpose is to put up the original Angle website just as it existed before, at least as far as the about, positions and endorsements pages.
They've copied the original Angle website, and basically reposted it under the auspices of "The Nevada State Democratic Party."
So their explicit and stated purpose is to put up the original Angle website just as it existed before, at least as far as the about, positions and endorsements pages."
Generally speaking, unless something has been copyrighted, you're able to copy it and repurpose it. The 1st Amendment is robust in this regard, or so the Court has held. As I said, absent problems with respect to the campaign finance laws, I don't believe an injunction would be granted.