Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2010 4:07:57 PM PDT by Takethathill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Takethathill

Yes, California.

Hypocrites abound...


2 posted on 07/06/2010 4:13:02 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill

Maybe someone can confirm; was this provision thrown out by the California courts?


4 posted on 07/06/2010 4:19:13 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill

California’s law is almost identical to Arizona’s. Missouri also has a very similar law.


5 posted on 07/06/2010 4:23:01 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill

Apparently there are claims that this is unenforceable. Something about the proposition it was tied to not being passed.

Any idea what that’s about?


6 posted on 07/06/2010 4:25:30 PM PDT by HushTX ( quit whining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill

I guessed it was Calif the minute I started reading this.

A law is just words on paper until it’s enforced, and the current invasion of illegals are banking on that.


15 posted on 07/06/2010 4:58:03 PM PDT by Bullish (Been to all 57 States.... Or is it 58?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill

I heard something about this on somebody’s radio show and I think they said something like the difference between them
was that in Cal. the person has to be ‘arrested’ for some offense before inquiring into their legal status,
while in Arizona, the law says the person has to be ‘stopped’ for some other purpose before inquiring into their legal status.
Other than that they were pretty much the same.
At least that’s what I think they said.


18 posted on 07/06/2010 6:17:28 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (If November does not turn out well, then beware of December.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Takethathill; xzins; blue-duncan; wmfights

That was part of Prop186 which is currently under a permanent injunction preventing it from being enforced.

FWIW, the injunction was never appealed. The law is on the books but unless the Governor were to direct the Attorney General to file an appeal to overturn the injuntion, the law is unenforceable.

Maybe someone should ask Meg Whitman whether she would be willing to challenge the injunction.


20 posted on 07/06/2010 7:11:57 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson