Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26

The only thing certifiable are your statements.

Show me a military NDB approach with a 50 meters DH and making the approach on AP.

Put up or shut up. And move along.

Again a pilot you aint. I could care less if you are certified.


18 posted on 07/07/2010 3:25:44 PM PDT by theanchoragedailyruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: theanchoragedailyruse

Where are you getting this insanity?

Where did I say there was an NDB approach with a 50 meter decision height?

Come on, drop the Tin Hat stuff.


19 posted on 07/07/2010 7:14:19 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: theanchoragedailyruse
BTW, to give you an idea how far into the realm of Tin Foil Hat lunacy this post is;

#1, NDB approaches do NOT have a Decision Height (DH.) Only precision approaches have DHs NDB approaches have Minimum Descent Altitudes (MDA). Operationally, they are very different.

#2. Decision Heights and Minimum Descent Altitudes are expressed in feet, not meters. I have flown instrument approaches to both Borispol (Kiev) and 34R at Petropavlovsk. Even in these old USSR countries, the DH and MDA altitudes are expressed in feet, not meters.

(See http://www.airalandalus.org/vueltas/negocios/cartas/UHPP.pdf) for an example.

Just one more example that this is all Tin Foil Hat BS.

20 posted on 07/07/2010 7:51:46 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson