To: free me; stephenjohnbanker; All
If McCain does manage to hold on to his Senate seat, we will have Sarah to thank for it, and she will bear responsibility for each and every sort of RINO crap that comes out of McStain for the next 6 years, or whenever he croaks off, whichever comes first.
Only in the minds of the insane.
OK Batman, riddle me this: it is well known that McCain's suspension of his damn presidential campaign in 2008 to trot his demented ass back to Washington to vote for the Big Bailout, combined with his patronizing comments regarding Comrade Zero "America has nothing to fear from an 0bama Administration", et al, essentially threw the election to the Kenyan Usurper. McCain NEVER engaged and fought 0bama with the same ferocity he reserves for conservatives, particuarly J.D. Hayworth.
So answer us pal, is McCain, or is he not, responsible for putting 0bama in the White House due to his pathetic conduct as a candidate?
Yes or No.
Then, ask yourself again if Sarah Palin will be responsible for McCain returning to the Senate for another six year term thanks to her consistent and continuous campaigning and support for him in Arizona?
Your own sanity will be defined by how you answer.
75 posted on
07/06/2010 7:02:32 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(Do you support John McCain? If so, you're an effin' IDIOT! He's nothing but '0bama-lite'.)
To: mkjessup
You are not capable of defining others sanity, pal.
Only kooks and nutjobs believe Mccain’s political fortunes will have any effect on Sarah Palin, should she seek office in the future, pal.
The people of Arizona will be to blame should Juan win, pal.
78 posted on
07/06/2010 7:26:32 AM PDT by
free me
(Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson