Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

My point is that I’ve been in the 250 range at 6’2. Should I be excluded as a lard ass? I understand the arguement for planes. But should Disney spend all that money in R&D and not be able to accomodate people of the upper limit of average without compromising safety for youngsters?


35 posted on 07/05/2010 2:45:16 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: goseminoles

I guess I should replace the work should with could. Could Disney accomodate large people? Everyone is assuming large people are fat or lazy. Disney with its money and technology should be able to build a ride for most. Even NFL players should they choose to visit Disney and ride.


36 posted on 07/05/2010 2:52:19 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: goseminoles

“But should Disney spend all that money in R&D and not be able to accomodate people of the upper limit of average without compromising safety for youngsters?”

That’s not your call. It is their business.

“My point is that I’ve been in the 250 range at 6’2. Should I be excluded as a lard ass? I understand the arguement for planes.”

I have BIL that is 6’4” and 245. He’s primarily muscle. My weight lifting partner is 6’2” and 225. If you are not muscle at 6’2” and 250, then, yes, you are a lard ass. Today’s standards might make you seem not a lard ass, but 250 is fat for most people.


37 posted on 07/05/2010 3:00:32 PM PDT by CodeToad ("Idiocracy" is not just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson