Posted on 07/03/2010 7:11:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As the U.S.A. celebrates its 234th birthday, the plight of a quintessentially American innovation says volumes about the state of the union.
As American as the grand slam, the Mustang convertible, and the constitutional republic, Thomas Alva Edison’s incandescent light bulb is among this nation’s most enduring gifts to mankind. Granted U.S. Patent No. 223,898 on January 27, 1880 (after some 1,200 experiments), Edison’s “Electric-Lamp” essentially made night optional for most Earthlings. Days stopped ending at sunset. Simple, convenient, and cheap, Edison’s greatest invention also was far safer than the flammable kerosene lamps they replaced.
Today’s federal government, naturally, had to hammer something that has hummed along nicely for 130 years. In one of his most shameful moments, former president George W. Bush foolishly signed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. EISA establishes performance criteria that Edisonian bulbs cannot meet. As the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) explains: “These standards, which begin in 2012, will eliminate low efficiency incandescent light bulbs from the market.”
According to an April 14 fact sheet from General Electric, which Edison founded in 1876, 276 versions of its incandescent bulbs will start to vanish just 18 months from now. Few Americans realize that federal busybodies plan to snatch their traditional bulbs. Sylvania’s December 2009 survey of 302 adults found that “awareness of the 2012 100-watt bulb phase-out” is just 18 percent (error margin: +/- 5.7 percent).
EISA has made more common compact fluorescent lights, those swirly bulbs with distinct pros and cons. Costlier up front, energy-efficient CFLs eventually save money. They also require less frequent replacement than do traditional bulbs.
To discover CFLs’ negatives, try setting a romantic mood with a dimmer switch. This is, at best, a hit or miss proposition. Scarier still, just drop one onto your kitchen floor. Its internal mercury is highly toxic. If spilled, it requires something approximating a Superfund cleanup. The Environmental Protection Agency warns that if a CFL breaks on one’s apparel or bedspread, “Do not wash such clothing or bedding because mercury fragments in the clothing may contaminate the machine and/or pollute sewage” (emphasis added).
CFLs should be discarded at recycling centers. Hundreds of millions of busy Americans, however, will toss these dangerous bulbs in the trash, atop table scraps and junk mail. CFLs will clog landfills from coast to coast. Decades hence, mercury will have leeched into the environment. Americans will wonder why people are suffering brain, kidney, and lung damage. Medical visits will yield lawsuits. And yet another national disaster will erupt, courtesy of Washington, D.C.
Team Obama, characteristically, inherited a big-government jalopy from the Bush-Rove administration and then turbocharged it.
As June 25’s Washington Times detailed, 91 pages of brand-new FTC rules force manufacturers to label the front of CFL packages regarding brightness (in lumens) and annual energy cost (in dollars). Packages’ sides or rears must disclose bulbs’ lifespan, color appearance, wattage, voltage, and mercury content. This information may — but need not — appear in English, French, and Spanish.
If manufacturers cannot place all this information on small packages, the FTC offers this advice:
Lighting Facts format for small packages. If the total surface area of the product package available for labeling is less than 24 square inches and the package shape or size cannot accommodate the standard label required by paragraph (b)(4), manufacturers may provide the information specified in paragraph (b)(3) using a smaller, linear label following the format, terms, explanatory text, specifications, and minimum sizes illustrated in Prototype Label 7 in Appendix L.
As page 86 of these June 18 draft regulations illustrates, the FTC knows precisely what these labels should say: ( SEE ILLUSTRATION BELOW )
“I think the incandescent light bulb was one of the great contributions to the art of architecture in the 20th century,” says Howard M. Brandston, a legendary lighting designer renowned for relighting the Statute of Liberty before its rededication on July 4, 1986. “Lighting played a huge role, as essential as the structures themselves. That was thanks to Thomas Edison.”
“If the federal government insists on banning the incandescent lamp, it significantly will decrease the quality of life in every home in America,” Brandston tells me. “The CFLs cannot be dimmed properly. When you dim one, the spectral power distribution and color quality of the lamp make people look cadaverous. Most people who wear makeup will not need to do so to look like the Bride of Frankenstein.”
“Here we have the government entering all of our homes. Our homes are our castles,” says Brandston, a former adjunct professor of architecture at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a founder of its Lighting Research Center. “Now they are telling us how to light our homes, and they are putting onerous burdens on us in terms of handling these toxic CFLs. The government should not enter our homes, tell us how to live, endanger our health, and ruin our quality of life.”
Republicans and thinking Democrats running for Congress this fall should pledge publicly to repeal the federal ban on Thomas Edison’s monumental creation. Why not try something worthy of the Spirit of ’76? Keep traditional bulbs, CFLs, halogens, and everything else on the market, and allow Americans to purchase whatever bulbs help them pursue happiness.
July 4 would be a perfect day for such a Declaration of Incandescence.
— Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University.
Whur you bin boy?
Don’t forget, most of the CFL’s will be made in China. If anyone can find a way to make them even more toxic, the Chinese will.
Fluorescent lights give me headaches. I’m constantly restocking my supply of incandescent bulbs to hold out as long as possible.
I can understand the desire to save enegy through efficient lighting but CFL are not a best fit.I find the CFL do not last as long as claimed,and who spends $5.95 mailing a burned out bulb and receipt to get a "free" replacement of a $5 bulb?
Whether the incandescent bulb is too hot, too wasting of energy or what not should not really be the business of government.
LET THE FREE MARKET DECIDE. If the value for money of Edison’s invention drops to a point where it is no longer economical to own them, people will abandon them.
Why do we allow politicians and bureaucrats to decide this for us ? First, the light bulb, then what next ? Eat your veggies three times a day or else.... ???
What kind of people are we becoming ?
Yes, Bush signed the legislation, but not one mention was made that it was written and passed by Pelosi and Reid and a Democrat Congress..
I’m just glad I have an unused shower stall in the office bathroom that I can use to hoard all my contraband like incandescent bulbs, salt, phosphate Cascade, and soft TP. I’m using a spreadsheet now to inventory my lightbulb use and look for gaps to fill in the next two years.
Since this is a developing technology, the options in 2 more years could be significantly improved over these levels. However, once a legislative fiat has been passed, it frequently steamrolls over other options!
It bothers me if I try to read by them, I have them in some areas of my house but others, I want more light and I want it as soon as I turn it on, not wait til it warms up.
I am stocked up for perhaps 20 years....I'm 65 years old so if I make it to 85, I'll just be in the dark.
Of course if the current socialistic trend continues apace, 85 year olds won't exist 20 years from now.
LED’s are a lot more expensive, but don’t they pay for themselves in a few years?
These bulbs don’t last nearly as long as claimed. Even when they still “work” after a year or so, they take longer and longer to warm up, and the light gets weaker.
They need to test the bulbs under realistic conditions: on and off 4-10 times per day, in enclosed fixtures, laying sideways or upside-down, and/or a combination of all those conditions.
No one’s lived long enough yet to see, but yup, they are good ~ and in a constant on/off situation (blinking) they have HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF HOURS of expected life ~
LED’s will eventually come down in price, once they catch on. What will help is the new LED lighting systems with a color temperature closer to traditional incandescents, instead of the intense blue emphasis. This may also help with automobile headlamps as well, since light with a lot of “blue” in it is useless in fog/mist conditions. While they might not reach the same price per unit as incandescents (but you never know, and I am trying to exclude goobermint imposing a “nanny state” tax on incandescents if they decide to allow them to continue), they are still far more durable than incandescents and compact fluorescents.
Damn I wish I had a stash of Phospate Cascade. I had to switch to Finish (formerly known as Electrasol), but now Finish is... finished.
How bout a few thousand people with burned out CFLs showing up at the capitol and smashing their bulbs on the capitol steps!
Has any one ever noticed an odor in your office that could be coming from that unused shower?
Check out the Vu1 bulb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.