Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crescen7
I agree with most of your post, except the notion that the Bush view was the correct one.

We went in there to punish the Taliban, not recreate a State.

We can keep the Taliban from regaining power with our mobility.

13 posted on 07/03/2010 4:45:14 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration

Thanks, I’m a bit surprised that I didn’t get flamed for my post.

I agree we went in to punish the Taliban, who were providing safe haven for Al Queda, and ultimately to defeat Al Queda. But I think it was always a part of the plan to attempt to see that Afghanistan did not fall back into the power vacuum that allowed the Taliban to flourish after the retreat of the Russians.

I do concur though, that our commitment to “nation building” needed to be limited, and that a small mobile strike force based in a secured functioning population center should be capable of preventing the Taliban from regaining a serious foothold.


45 posted on 07/03/2010 1:59:23 PM PDT by crescen7 (game on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson