Skip to comments.
Hatch Opposes Kagan’s Nomination
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 07-02-10
| Mary Lu Carnevale
Posted on 07/02/2010 1:23:50 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
Edited on 07/02/2010 1:57:20 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: AggieSteph
41
posted on
07/02/2010 3:17:47 PM PDT
by
JDW11235
(I think I got it now!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Is that a verifiable fact? I ask because Lindsey is much more intelligent than his senate husband.
42
posted on
07/02/2010 3:22:48 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: onyx
New York Times....he told them.
” “After tossing out a few if-I-can-make-it-anyone-can references to his humble beginnings as a pool-hall owner’s son in Central, S.C., and his 800 combined SAT score, the senator fell into his message du jour: “
That is pathetic. I thought only football and basketball players could do this ;-)
New York Times....he told them.
43
posted on
07/02/2010 3:34:55 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
To: onyx
44
posted on
07/02/2010 3:37:14 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
To: GOP_Lady
45
posted on
07/02/2010 3:49:12 PM PDT
by
Shady
(No more LAWS based on LIES!!!!)
To: Venturer
He fooled me, I thought sure he would sell us out-—and it isnt over yet. Agreed. I admit I thought for sure he was helping her through, the way he was advising her prior to the hearings.
But, as you say, it's not over yet.
46
posted on
07/02/2010 3:53:38 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: jackibutterfly
47
posted on
07/02/2010 3:55:39 PM PDT
by
brothers4thID
(http://scarlettsays.blogspot.com/)
To: onyx
I also hope he convinces the rest. But even if they filibuster we can’t stop her nomination can we?? It is a question, because I have really wanted to know.
48
posted on
07/02/2010 3:56:46 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
49
posted on
07/02/2010 4:00:56 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: gidget7
Yes, I think they can stop her, if all 41 stand together.
50
posted on
07/02/2010 4:21:11 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Hmmm. So much for test scores, huh? The man is how old? Almost 55, IIRC. He has a fairly sharp mind, with moments of brilliance, which is the reason I find him so damn reprehensible. He actually knows he's doing wrong.
51
posted on
07/02/2010 4:27:25 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: SoCalPol
It is moot anyways. More Dems in the Senate than Republicans. She could be stopped in Committee if no Republican votes for her. The only reason we have Sotomayor is that Lindseeeeey caved. All the other GOP senators on the Judiciary Committee voted nay. Her nomination would have failed if he had stuck to his guns and done the same.
Betcha we see a repeat performance. Makes me sick.
52
posted on
07/02/2010 4:29:17 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
To: onyx
Perhaps someone here knows definitively? I would like to think you are right, and we can start pressuring them.
53
posted on
07/02/2010 4:30:03 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: gidget7
She can be stopped in the Judiciary Committee if no Republican votes for her. She must have one vote from the minority party.
It will be Flimsy Grahamnesty, just like with Sotomayor.
54
posted on
07/02/2010 4:30:44 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
To: gidget7
I'm right. She can be filibustered with 41, but she can also be stopped in the Judiciary Committee and never make it to the full senate for a vote.
Link to Sotomayor's vote
55
posted on
07/02/2010 4:36:15 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: freespirited
Well, we had best start pounding on Gramnesty’s door!!
56
posted on
07/02/2010 4:37:11 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: onyx
57
posted on
07/02/2010 4:43:35 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
To: onyx
Thanks Orin. Now, convince the rest of your side of the aisle. The RINO Maine sisters won't go for it, and Kagan is probably McCain's "good friend."
58
posted on
07/02/2010 7:53:27 PM PDT
by
fwdude
To: onyx
Absolutely, Hatch must not be planning to retire in 2012, as would seem his sensible approach. He is still waiting for Bill Clinton to “come clean”! Bennett, however, is free to vote for Kagan.
To: moose2004
Hasn’t “Lovable Lindsey” already endorsed her? He is such an embarrassment to SC that no other election decision by those voters means anything.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson