Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skepolitic

the biggest restriction, in my opinion, on the federal government was the nothing could be passed due to the senate being controlled by state legislatures.


7 posted on 07/02/2010 9:28:51 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: rigelkentaurus
the biggest restriction, in my opinion, on the federal government was the nothing could be passed due to the senate being controlled by state legislatures.

Which, of course, is why the Progressives were staunch advocates of direct election of senators and got the 17th Amendment in annus horibilis (1913, the year that the US got the federal income tax, direct election of senators, the Federal Reserve, and President Woodrow Wilson).

By the way, a reasonable reading of Article V yields the conclusion that 17th Amendment should be considered invalid: "no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived it's [sic] equal Suffrage in the Senate." Ten states never ratified the 17th Amendment, thus losing their Suffrage without Consent. But that's just more evidence that the entire Constitution is a dead letter.

10 posted on 07/02/2010 10:06:47 AM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson