To: sonofstrangelove
I’m thinking in terms of mils and meters and MTBF, A-sub-oh and those things.
With longer range comes a desire for improved pointing accuracy, measured in mils. (A mil is the angle subtended by one meter at on kilometer, about a milliradian.)
Russian short range artillery rockets are notoriously inaccurate, so worry about were you aimed the damned thing in the first place would imply improved accuracy.
11 posted on
07/01/2010 3:47:21 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Im thinking in terms of mils and meters and MTBF, A-sub-oh and those things. With longer range comes a desire for improved pointing accuracy, measured in mils. (A mil is the angle subtended by one meter at on kilometer, about a milliradian.
Oh I see. Thanks for pointing it out.I can't give an opinion on the mean time between failures(MTBF).I would not be too confortable with any answer that I may give. I can only give general stats.
12 posted on
07/01/2010 3:57:10 AM PDT by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
You may want to check on the SAGEM site, but I doubt that they would publish the technical data on the SIGMA. Even Wikipedia which is notorious of giving out technical data does not mention it.
13 posted on
07/01/2010 4:05:38 AM PDT by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson