If she has panties to prove something, I’m sure there was more then ‘groping’.
However premature ejaculation might have slowed the pig down somewhat.
Just like Kartoon, he’ll get away with it. Probably get an award from
his groupies.
If she has panties to prove something, I’m sure there was more then ‘groping’.
However premature ejaculation might have slowed the pig down somewhat.
************************
But it won’t establish whether or not this pathetic frottage was consensual, which is the essence of whether or not a crime occurred. The pivot point will be consent.
The hour, the location, the profession, the long delayed formal complaint, the payment of over $500.00 for some kind of services rendered will all be rich material for a defense attorney (or a politically tainted investigator or DA) to find reasonable doubt or insufficiency of evidence.
The narrative may be credible, but factual determinations as to consent will hinge on the weight of verbal testimony, which is eminently subject to political . . . well, stroke.
Remember Paula Jones? She would have been shot down in flames but for the sheer volume of other complanants, notably Juanita Broddrick.
Thus far, this is a weak case even for a willing prosecutor, even with DNA evidence. Whether it goes any further or not, the CRAZED SEX POODLE may have gotten ‘fixed’ in public opinion, however.
If others come forward, then the case may have some traction.
I am inclined to believe the woman, but I don’t see proof beyond a reasonable doubt at this point.
If he is found guilty, he should be impeached, convicted and removed from the taxpayers’ payroll.