Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

You didn’t address my question - were people unnecessarily expose to diseases, as the letter they sent out indicates, or not?


26 posted on 06/30/2010 9:21:40 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

No, there is no proof that two cleanings was a problem

However, one cleaning was what was required and apparently nothing more, so this is an overreaction.

How many times do you need to be told?


27 posted on 06/30/2010 9:23:29 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: skeeter
According to a statement from the VA, the dental equipment was sterilized – but it was “not sterilized to the exact specifications of the manufacturers guidelines.”

Although the VA concluded that the risk of “infection was extremely low,” the agency decided it was still necessary to disclose the error to patients who were treated at the medical center during that 13-month period. They are now offering free blood tests to screen for HIV as well as hepatitis B and C.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,595625,00.html

It was washed twice, which was not protocol.

28 posted on 06/30/2010 9:27:10 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson