Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City: One handgun per person 'sufficient' (Barf!)
The Chicago Suntimes ^ | Speilman | Fran

Posted on 06/29/2010 6:57:23 PM PDT by lex33

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2010 6:57:24 PM PDT by lex33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lex33

How many handguns per household will the criminals be restricted to?


2 posted on 06/29/2010 7:00:31 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33
More importantly, we should enforce a "maximum of one lawyer per city" rule, starting with Chicago.

Any more than that and they start becoming a public nuisance, and over time, a danger to the public safety...

3 posted on 06/29/2010 7:01:01 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

They’ve had hundreds of people shot over the past couple of months, and they’re worried about the law abiding citizens?


4 posted on 06/29/2010 7:01:50 PM PDT by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

It’s none of the City’s BUSINESS HOW many handgun’s, or shotgun’s, or rifles, or any other weapons I have... In fact, the State NOR the Feds need inquire either! It’s called the SECOND AMENDMENT. LOOK IT UP.


5 posted on 06/29/2010 7:01:55 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

What about folks who are ambidextrous?


6 posted on 06/29/2010 7:01:54 PM PDT by twhitak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

And what exactly is drawing the line on the number of guns now ? Criminals dont care about gun laws you stupid %^@#s.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 7:02:16 PM PDT by culpeper (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

This is a rather odd logic.

Perhaps only allowing one roll of toilet paper in the house until the first one is finished works too?

How about allowing only one beer in the house per consumer, until the first one is finished?

How about enforcing one vehicle per citizen?

Or the idea of limiting one guy to one cup of coffee in the morning?

Then there’s the idea of just allowing loser of a newspaper in the City to exist...that’s a pretty decent idea too?


8 posted on 06/29/2010 7:02:25 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

What about the ones for my kids and the cat?


9 posted on 06/29/2010 7:03:05 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

What if a person has a disability and must use a firearm that does not meet the classification of a handgun? I know of one such person who must use a firearm that is technically classified as “any other weapon” or “short barrel rifles or shotguns”.

Guess what... Chicago is looking like a great battleground for the 2nd Amendment Americans with Disabilities Act court case....

So, you keep up the shenanigans Chicago... You’re volunteering to be the dart board again.


10 posted on 06/29/2010 7:03:43 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

Because obviously their handgun ban has worked so well until now.

http://chicago.everyblock.com/crime/by-primary-type/homicide/


11 posted on 06/29/2010 7:03:52 PM PDT by DCurts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
Well, as usual, the criminals in Chicago are not at any risk ~ this bandit empire has always been that way.

On the other hand, the proposal is for Chicago to have something like 2,850,000 handguns ~ and that would be in addition to all the long rifles, shotguns, flamethrowers, bazookas and and zip guns.

Could be quite interesting.

This would provide a weapons density that's pretty much on the order of what you saw in that guy's basement in TREMORS.

12 posted on 06/29/2010 7:04:15 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
I only need the one.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
13 posted on 06/29/2010 7:06:56 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lex33
Can I choose one of these?

And can I carry it with me wherever I go?

14 posted on 06/29/2010 7:07:00 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33
In Mayberry, the Deputy only had one bullet.
15 posted on 06/29/2010 7:07:37 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obama, proving Hillary right that it takes a Village Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gapplega

Exactly. It’s an absolute joke.


16 posted on 06/29/2010 7:09:03 PM PDT by lex33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lex33

One newspaper per city. One TV newscast per city. One telephone per household.


17 posted on 06/29/2010 7:09:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gapplega

Forty four shot last weekend. Thirteen died.


18 posted on 06/29/2010 7:10:42 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lex33
past convictions for unlawful use of a weapon.

So what happens with people previously convicted of violating gun laws that have now been rendered unconstitutional? Can they appeal their convictions? Or do they have to carry this criminal conviction on their record, a conviction that would deny them lawful gun ownership?

19 posted on 06/29/2010 7:12:16 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lex33

Hmmmm, these jags are really setting themselevs up for beautiful law suits. One gun only. Kind of like allowing newly freed blacks after the civil war to only vote once.


20 posted on 06/29/2010 7:12:26 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson