[Christian_Capitalist]

Creationism isn't science.

Sure it is. Most of the great scientists of history were Creationists.

You can do your song and dance, but the Free Market isn't interested in purchasing much of what you are selling!

Okay. Then why don't you just support returning to Creationist Parents the $10,000 per-child, per-year which is currently extorted from them for the teaching of Evolutionism -- and prepare to marvel at the sudden, massive demand which will erupt for scientist-educators from the Discovery Institute, the Institute for Creation Research, the Creation Research Society, and the many other Creation Science foundations.

Of course, many Evolutionists will very quickly be out of a job, without Government Subsidies for the teaching of Child-Abuse Evolutionism. We Parents will not support Child Abusers with our purchasing dollars, for ANY amount of alleged post-graduation "payoff", given the Economic Choice.

But you don't want to do that, because you support Communism in Education, not Capitalism.

I, however, am a Capitalist.

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.” -- Thomas Jefferson

[allmendream]

Creationism is not science, it is antithetical to the scientific method to propose that you already know the answer and that all the data has to conform to what you already “know”.

For example, light from a galaxy one hundred million light years away; creationists just “know” that the universe is not that old, so they have a ‘fudge factor’ that they use to pound the square peg of the data into the round hole of their religious assumptions.

Most of the great scientists of history before 1860 were creationists. Do you know what happened in 1860? Do you know that most great scientists from that point on accepted evolution?

And I do not support Public schools; I know that the Free Market does do and will continue to do a better job. But so long as there ARE public schools, I am against teaching a particular religious belief instead of teaching science.
That is because I support the Constitution and freedom of conscience.

If you support teaching your particular religious views of creationism instead of the science of evolution; do you similarly support teaching the (supposed) history of the Semitic people in America as put forth by the Book of Mormon in history class in Utah? Should the teachings of the Quran prevail in Muslim dominated areas of Michigan (they are also creationists, if that helps you decide)?