>>>”Continuing to use the word islamist when you really mean muslim, is very confusing to others these days.”
I know you have your reasons for supporting “Muslims”.
However, you insisting & persisting to coin the term moderate Vs. radical “Muslims” (and all its variations) has been sufficiently confusing to many for the 4 yrs of my knowing you on FR.
After all, it has always been, as you put it, “Muslims” who are the Islamists (along with their foreign supporters such as you), and are the Main & the only prominent religious group who continuously & continually want to leverage on Moderate & Radical nonsense which you have avidly promoted.
Also, very disappointed with you for continously posting articles which, directly or indirectly, promote Islamic Regime Insider Clerics such as Mehdi Karroubi (and Montezari before his death), as well as unrepentent murderers & charlatans such as Mir Hossein Moussavi, but not surprised. Yet you seemingly contradict yourself by posting sympathetic articles about Neda Agha Sultan. I guess most know which side of your bread is buttered.
Why u feel it’s necessary to turn this into a personal attack is beyond me.
I’m not “coining” the term islamist. Someone else did that way before I ever used it.
You called Taheri an islamist. Using that term to describe Taheri was misleading. Apparently you weren’t aware of the meaning of the use of the word islamist these days, ie that the term refers to radicals. That’s all I wanted to straighten out.
Whatever i’ve posted in the past that you don’t like, has nothing to do with this.
If you don’t like Taheri, fine.
If you don’t like me or what I post, fine. But that has nothing to do with whether Taheri is an islamist - which he isn’t.