Seeing no 'sarc' tag here; am assuming you are serious. In which case; could you tell me; what in this article was Greene's greatest acheivement. . .or just name a few.
(Gettin 'elected' when one did nothing to render or invite the results in not an acheivement.) It IS, however; someone elses. . .
C'mon now. Did not Greene win the nomination fair and square? There is absolutely no evidence of cheating on his behalf.
And was that not an achievement? Especially given his modest means?
There's nothing wrong with that statement. Even if it's made tongue-in-cheek...
He doesn’t need an acheivement; he’s the nominee. DeMint should beat him handily, but that would be the result with the career pol in place on the ballot, also.