Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csmusaret

I think we are too quick to praise this whole situation unless we acknowledge Patraeus may be doing this to save as many troops as he can as the Democrats move to withdrawal.

Petraeus will eventually fail in Afghanistan because the Democrats in congress and President Zero won’t do what is necessary to win in the long run. Then the MSM and the Democrats will associate Patraeus to GWB and the blame game will go on once again.


87 posted on 06/27/2010 6:46:48 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Morgan in Denver
I agree, but now that Petraeus is the Jokers’ hand picked guy who do the rats blame when it all blows up and they start pulling out? It's getting a little lame to put it all on GW.
100 posted on 06/27/2010 6:56:45 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver; Alas Babylon!

I don’t know anyone who is “praising” this except the MSM. I don’t think Patton, Eisenhower, and MacArthur combined could win this war because no one will define win. Any campaign to win the hearts and minds of the Afghanistan people are doomed to fail. The Afghani minds never ecsaped the 16th century and the Muslim fanatics among them don’t have hearts.


116 posted on 06/27/2010 7:15:49 AM PDT by csmusaret (The way his orders become law, Obama's personal automobile must be a Fiat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson