Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker

“This is not Thatcher’s Britain. It’s highly unlikey the Brits could prevail in another military campaign. They lack the Naval assets they had back in the 80’s.”

...which is exactly why there is new saber-rattling.


11 posted on 06/26/2010 5:08:18 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie

So do the argies. And this time, they would be facing more than a mere score of Royal Marines like they did last time they invaded. They would be facing over 1,000 troops (most of them battle-hardened from a stint or two in Helmand), a Squadron of Eurofighters, artillery, and AAA missile batteries, at least one warship, as well as the local FIDF acting as an auxiliary to the main garrison.
The airbase at RAF Mount Pleasant also means that more men and equipment could be strategically airlifted in during the rise in tensions that would precede an invasion...


14 posted on 06/26/2010 5:30:11 PM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: The Antiyuppie
"...which is exactly why there is new saber-rattling."

UK has a new PM.

So, if a bet were to be laid . . . .?

yitbos

18 posted on 06/26/2010 6:07:58 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson