Posted on 06/26/2010 2:11:03 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
Peter Orszag, Barack Obamas budget director, resigned this week partly in frustration over his lack of success in persuading the Obama administration to tackle the fiscal deficit more aggressively, according to sources inside and outside the White House.
Mr Orszag, whose publicly stated reasons for leaving were that he was exhausted after years in high pressure jobs and also that he wanted to plan for his wedding in September, is seen as the guardian of fiscal conservatism within the White House.
Other members of Mr Obamas economic team, notably Lawrence Summers, the head of the National Economic Council, have placed more emphasis on the need for continued short-term spending increases to counteract what increasingly looks like an anaemic economic recovery in the US.
Although Mr Orszag agrees with the need to push short-term spending, particularly in the Senate, which again this week failed to pass a measure extending insurance to the unemployed, the budget director has become increasingly frustrated with the administrations caution on longer-term fiscal restraint.
Mr Orszag, whom Mr Obama has dubbed a propeller-head because of his brilliant facility with projections and spreadsheets, has tried but failed to convince his colleagues to step up the action, according to one insider.
In particular, he has collided with the political team, led by Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obamas chief of staff, over Mr Obamas 2008 election pledge not to raise taxes on any households earning less than $250,000 a year a category that covers more than 98 per cent of Americans.
Economists say that would put all the fiscal emphasis on draconian and highly unrealistic spending cuts, or else pushing the marginal tax rates on the very rich to confiscatory levels. Peter feels strongly that this is a pledge that has to be broken if the President is to take a lead on Americas fiscal crisis, says an administration official not authorised to speak on the matter.
He felt that rather than resign in protest in January, when next years budget is being prepared, he would rather go amicably now.
Earlier this week, Mr Obama told the weekly cabinet meeting in the White House that he had tried but failed to persuade Mr Orszag to stay on. On Friday Mr Orszag told the FT: I want to emphasise that it would be inaccurate to say that I have told the president personally that Im leaving because of concerns about our fiscal policy.
In a statement, Mr Orszag said: The reason I am stepping down as OMB director is that after nearly four years in government service running CBO and then OMB it is time for me personally to move on.
We had historical successes in bringing the economy back from the brink of a potential depression, and in beginning the difficult shift toward a better health care system. It is true that the nation still faces important fiscal challenges over the medium and long term, which was the motivation behind the Presidents creation of the fiscal commission. The President has made it clear to the economic team that he is seriously committed to tackling our fiscal problems, and I look forward to continuing to support him and my colleagues in the ongoing effort to put the nation back on a sustainable fiscal course.
On Saturday, Mr Obama will hold his first meeting with David Cameron, the UKs new prime minister, at the G20 meeting in Toronto. This week the UK announced a strong package of spending cuts and tax increases to tackle its deficit, leaving the US as the only major economy that has yet to unveil such plans.
Many Democrat/socialists now insist it is time to tax earnings under $250K.
Seen by whom, Stevie Wonder?
What, is he gay? Men don't plan weddings, Brides plan weddings with their mothers and pretend to involve the bridegroom who is indispensable but otherwise an inert participant.
The world really is upside down if this loon is seen as conservative. He wanted to tax us small people overtly. That’s conservative?
With him leaving, just imagine how much worse it's going to get! :-(
I agree. I was a visual aide at my wedding. Luckily, I was at mountain warfare training the month before my wedding, so I showed up the day before the main event. This worked out quite well. She got what she wanted (an wedding just like she wanted) and I got what I wanted (her).
“an inert participant” That’s really funny. Inert is right.
And so, as any remaining voices of reason realize they are dealing with a group of deranged Keynesians, soon there will be nobody left in the administration who dares to oppose the destructive course upon which this country has so resolutely embarked, which ends in one of two ways: debt repudiation, or war.
What about good old inflation? To be followed by wage and price controls. That's what the socialists want, is it not? All socialist governments love freedom of the press -- of the printing press!
When I finally realized that Zero's intention is to muck up our economy, not fix it, things bacame easier to understand. Create a crisis, then propose more socialism to save 'the little guy'. And yeah, it will be all Bush's fault.
Orzag is leaving so he doesn’t get completely tarred by Obama’s lies and economic failure. The idiot chile president can’t do simple things like get oil skimmers and sand berms in place in the Gulf...Then he surely has no idea about deficits and national economies and economic success....Though with a teleprompter and reading fancy words written by someone else, he does a good job at faking competence.
[he wanted to plan for his wedding in September
What, is he gay? Men don’t plan weddings, Brides plan weddings with their mothers and pretend to involve the bridegroom who is indispensable but otherwise an inert participant.]
So who is he actually going to marry? The girlfriend he got pregnant or the hot TV anchor he left her for?
Peter Orszag lies like a rug!
“The world really is upside down if this loon is seen as conservative.”
You said it. Orszag was fully complicit with the mendacious accounting in the health reform bill, saying with a straight face it would bend the cost curve (reduce health spending) and lower the deficit. In that context, claims that he really cares about our long term deficits ring very hollow.
Peter feels strongly that this is a pledge that has to be broken if the President is to take a lead on Americas fiscal crisis,
Don’t worry Pete, it already has been done and will continue to be done in greater and greater measure.
That said, this article is truly written in a Bizzaro world fashion.
The DEMS are AFRAID to do a Budget this year!!! Or they are INCOMPETENT...or they just don’t want the sheeple know that their taxes are going way up!!
IMO, for these neo-marxists, agenda comes before everything. Agenda being the accumulation and consolidation of power - national healthcare, amnesty for illegals for votes, cap 'n trade, paying off fellow democrats by $ or favors, reinventing ACORN, etc. In doing so, these clowns are snowblind with ambition - they believe that their time is short-lived - and rightly so. If they destroy the farm and the henhouse to get the goose that lays the golden egg, so be it.
I vastly agree with that. In a right-wing, conspiratorial sort of way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.