Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Budget director] Orszag exit reveals deficit policy split
The Financial Times ^ | 6/25/2010 | Edward Luce

Posted on 06/26/2010 2:11:03 AM PDT by bruinbirdman

Peter Orszag, Barack Obama’s budget director, resigned this week partly in frustration over his lack of success in persuading the Obama administration to tackle the fiscal deficit more aggressively, according to sources inside and outside the White House.

Mr Orszag, whose publicly stated reasons for leaving were that he was exhausted after years in high pressure jobs and also that he wanted to plan for his wedding in September, is seen as the guardian of fiscal conservatism within the White House.

Other members of Mr Obama’s economic team, notably Lawrence Summers, the head of the National Economic Council, have placed more emphasis on the need for continued short-term spending increases to counteract what increasingly looks like an anaemic economic recovery in the US.

Although Mr Orszag agrees with the need to push short-term spending, particularly in the Senate, which again this week failed to pass a measure extending insurance to the unemployed, the budget director has become increasingly frustrated with the administration’s caution on longer-term fiscal restraint.

Mr Orszag, whom Mr Obama has dubbed a “propeller-head” because of his brilliant facility with projections and spreadsheets, has tried but failed to convince his colleagues to “step up the action”, according to one insider.

In particular, he has collided with the political team, led by Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama’s chief of staff, over Mr Obama’s 2008 election pledge not to raise taxes on any households earning less than $250,000 a year – a category that covers more than 98 per cent of Americans.

Economists say that would put all the fiscal emphasis on draconian – and highly unrealistic – spending cuts, or else pushing the marginal tax rates on the very rich to confiscatory levels. “Peter feels strongly that this is a pledge that has to be broken if the President is to take a lead on America’s fiscal crisis,” says an administration official not authorised to speak on the matter.

“He felt that rather than resign in protest in January, when next year’s budget is being prepared, he would rather go amicably now.”

Earlier this week, Mr Obama told the weekly cabinet meeting in the White House that he had tried but failed to persuade Mr Orszag to stay on. On Friday Mr Orszag told the FT: “I want to emphasise that it would be inaccurate to say that I have told the president personally that I’m leaving because of concerns about our fiscal policy.”

In a statement, Mr Orszag said: “The reason I am stepping down as OMB director is that after nearly four years in government service – running CBO and then OMB – it is time for me personally to move on.

“We had historical successes in bringing the economy back from the brink of a potential depression, and in beginning the difficult shift toward a better health care system. It is true that the nation still faces important fiscal challenges over the medium and long term, which was the motivation behind the President’s creation of the fiscal commission. The President has made it clear to the economic team that he is seriously committed to tackling our fiscal problems, and I look forward to continuing to support him and my colleagues in the ongoing effort to put the nation back on a sustainable fiscal course.”

On Saturday, Mr Obama will hold his first meeting with David Cameron, the UK’s new prime minister, at the G20 meeting in Toronto. This week the UK announced a strong package of spending cuts and tax increases to tackle its deficit, leaving the US as the only major economy that has yet to unveil such plans.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnc4dnc; dnccorruption; enemydomestic; taxcheatincharge
Looks like Orszag really didn't want to just spend more time with his family.

Many Democrat/socialists now insist it is time to tax earnings under $250K.

1 posted on 06/26/2010 2:11:07 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Mr Orszag, whose publicly stated reasons for leaving were that he was exhausted after years in high pressure jobs and also that he wanted to plan for his wedding in September, is seen as the guardian of fiscal conservatism within the White House.

Seen by whom, Stevie Wonder?

2 posted on 06/26/2010 2:27:20 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
he wanted to plan for his wedding in September

What, is he gay? Men don't plan weddings, Brides plan weddings with their mothers and pretend to involve the bridegroom who is indispensable but otherwise an inert participant.


3 posted on 06/26/2010 2:41:33 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The world really is upside down if this loon is seen as conservative. He wanted to tax us small people overtly. That’s conservative?


4 posted on 06/26/2010 2:44:22 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Shakey Jake said, " The hippies will never survive!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog; Dahoser
The terrifying thing is that Orszag probably was - in a RELATIVISTIC SENSE - a budget conservative for this White House.

With him leaving, just imagine how much worse it's going to get! :-(

5 posted on 06/26/2010 3:21:44 AM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I agree. I was a visual aide at my wedding. Luckily, I was at mountain warfare training the month before my wedding, so I showed up the day before the main event. This worked out quite well. She got what she wanted (an wedding just like she wanted) and I got what I wanted (her).


6 posted on 06/26/2010 3:39:48 AM PDT by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“an inert participant” That’s really funny. Inert is right.


7 posted on 06/26/2010 3:53:16 AM PDT by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
I'm scratching my head at this --

And so, as any remaining voices of reason realize they are dealing with a group of deranged Keynesians, soon there will be nobody left in the administration who dares to oppose the destructive course upon which this country has so resolutely embarked, which ends in one of two ways: debt repudiation, or war.

What about good old inflation? To be followed by wage and price controls. That's what the socialists want, is it not? All socialist governments love freedom of the press -- of the printing press!

When I finally realized that Zero's intention is to muck up our economy, not fix it, things bacame easier to understand. Create a crisis, then propose more socialism to save 'the little guy'. And yeah, it will be all Bush's fault.

8 posted on 06/26/2010 4:01:13 AM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (BORDERS, LAWS and LANGUAGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Orzag is leaving so he doesn’t get completely tarred by Obama’s lies and economic failure. The idiot chile president can’t do simple things like get oil skimmers and sand berms in place in the Gulf...Then he surely has no idea about deficits and national economies and economic success....Though with a teleprompter and reading fancy words written by someone else, he does a good job at faking competence.


9 posted on 06/26/2010 4:13:41 AM PDT by dennisw (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid - Gen Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

[he wanted to plan for his wedding in September

What, is he gay? Men don’t plan weddings, Brides plan weddings with their mothers and pretend to involve the bridegroom who is indispensable but otherwise an inert participant.]

So who is he actually going to marry? The girlfriend he got pregnant or the hot TV anchor he left her for?


10 posted on 06/26/2010 4:23:47 AM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Peter Orszag lies like a rug!


11 posted on 06/26/2010 4:48:24 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

“The world really is upside down if this loon is seen as conservative.”

You said it. Orszag was fully complicit with the mendacious accounting in the health reform bill, saying with a straight face it would bend the cost curve (reduce health spending) and lower the deficit. In that context, claims that he really cares about our long term deficits ring very hollow.


12 posted on 06/26/2010 5:07:30 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“Peter feels strongly that this is a pledge that has to be broken if the President is to take a lead on America’s fiscal crisis,”

Don’t worry Pete, it already has been done and will continue to be done in greater and greater measure.

That said, this article is truly written in a Bizzaro world fashion.


13 posted on 06/26/2010 6:51:14 AM PDT by mike-zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The DEMS are AFRAID to do a Budget this year!!! Or they are INCOMPETENT...or they just don’t want the sheeple know that their taxes are going way up!!


14 posted on 06/26/2010 7:09:55 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion...the Human Scarifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
When I finally realized that Zero's intention is to muck up our economy, not fix it, things bacame easier to understand.

IMO, for these neo-marxists, agenda comes before everything. Agenda being the accumulation and consolidation of power - national healthcare, amnesty for illegals for votes, cap 'n trade, paying off fellow democrats by $ or favors, reinventing ACORN, etc. In doing so, these clowns are snowblind with ambition - they believe that their time is short-lived - and rightly so. If they destroy the farm and the henhouse to get the goose that lays the golden egg, so be it.

15 posted on 06/26/2010 7:34:39 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (George W. Bush was the last conservative democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
IMO, for these neo-marxists, agenda comes before everything.

I vastly agree with that. In a right-wing, conspiratorial sort of way.

16 posted on 06/26/2010 6:29:33 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Darn, lost my tagline... something about boarders, in-laws and bad language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson