Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

Actually I read an argument about this the other day. It was based on the premise that the Senate would have more responsibility to the State than to their own popular reelection.

They would have to think about how their actions affected the state. They would not have to be beholden to the special interests in Washington...but rather the special interests of their own homes and the impact of their actions on the states.

Kind of made sense.


38 posted on 06/30/2010 11:44:57 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I lived in VT for four years. That was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

There’s nothing wrong with the premise or argument in theory, the problem is with what happens with the reality when it is implemented. The high-mindedness would simply not materialize and was largely gone by the time of the 17th.


40 posted on 06/30/2010 11:08:47 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson