I've noticed that on stories, even if it is not partisan, they don't have much, or any, coverage on stories where they don't have one of their people on site or extensive video coverage. Often they don't even mention it. Also, like any operation, someone makes a decision on which stories to cover and concentrate on.
..or any, coverage on stories where they don’t have one of their people on site or extensive video coverage...etc
= = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = =
Do you think that possibly the ‘other’ networks aren’t sharing the ‘pool coverage’.
Isn’t that what they basically do anymore to cut costs?
I really don’t know as I don’t watch ANY of them.