Okay. But I was only asking an honest question, not actually having read any formal charges against the general. I know insubordination is usually loosely interpreted by most, by it's actually a narrowly-defined charge and may not apply in this case. Just wondering. Not questioning your sincerity.
I really don't know. With his resignation, I doubt we'll find out.
Unfortunate, this guy sounded like a field general, not a desk-bound one. We need more of the former and less of the latter.