Navy Official Discusses Climate Change Investment Strategy

DEFENSE.gov (AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE) ^ | June 21, 2010 | Bob Freeman

[fire4effect]

“Titley explained that to define the scope of needed investments the Navy will conduct capabilities-based assessments, which he described as foundational studies to determine the requirements for such things as force structure, infrastructure, command and control and communications. ?We’re doing one of these capabilities-based assessments for climate change in general, and another one focused specifically on the Arctic,? he said.

I cannot believe people actually get paid to come up with this nonsense. How much government speak can be crammed into one paragraph? These people need to be let go, then see how much the free market values their skills. We certainly cannot afford to pay for this nonsense.

[Reeses]

The “cutting edge” of technology is mainly about inventing new ways to kill annoying people. The Navy should be testing ways to make man-made weather weapons. A directed cyclone has the energy of a 10-megaton nuclear warhead detonating every 20 minutes. A fog can shield warships from detection. Once the Navy masters how to make clouds the whole climate change question changes to “What climate would you like?”

[dools007]

I hear your pain.

[dools007]

There is absolutely no scientific way to prove manmade carbon emissions are affecting either local or global weather to any measurable degree. However, we can prove that earth was cooling and heating up long before man came along.

In fact, over the past 10 or so years average temps have been going down. That’s why the envirowhackos replaced global warming with climate change.

We know that the so-called climate change science was cooked to achieve a specific result. There is nothing scientific about climate change.

It is an invention to enrich folks vested in the fraud, abet income redistribution and punish the success of the American economy.