Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Among the issues Petraeus may examine carefully involve the rules of engagement, which govern when troops can and cannot fire. Some believe those rules under McChrystal were too restrictive, effectively tying one hand behind the backs of troops.

Actually, I believe the idiotic ROE changes were initially demanded by Obama.


"Military casualties in Afghanistan is the largely unreported ,immediate change in the rules of engagement that Obama insisted on the first week he was in office. "


http://interact.stltoday.com/blogzone/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor/2009/11/get-america-back-on-track-with-amtrak/

32 posted on 06/24/2010 2:50:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
Actually, I believe the idiotic ROE changes were initially demanded by Obama.

I believe you're correct. McChrystal wrote them for Obama and made like he fully believed in them, I don't know whether he did or not. I'm fairly certain Petraeus didn't because as far as I know those were not his ROE in Iraq but we'll soon find out

34 posted on 06/24/2010 3:10:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Placemark.


39 posted on 06/24/2010 7:04:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson