Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nina0113

No, it’s to win female votes.


46 posted on 06/24/2010 3:40:32 PM PDT by militanttoby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: militanttoby
When Margaret Thatcher came in to existence I was in awe (and supported some of her policies because felt they were necessary at the time in Britain, considering her immediate predecessor & the state of things in Britain at the time ...) - also, in a very male dominated British political arena, one needs to consider that, although not many did ...

Let's face it, the Queen (as a female & in the scheme of things) doesn't count, she is Not elected by the people. She mostly has to maintain a certain image.

Margaret Thatcher (Hilda as known to her own Tory Party) was quite unique to her “conservative/tory” British party, but as most know, she did not support her “gender” & mostly she could not - surprise, surprise!

Yep, Yup and Yes, this is going to be one heck of an public election in Australia. Doubt if females are going to be duped by a Gillard, Julia, Or females simply “voting” for Tony Abbott for some $$ for parental scheme - it certainly won't be for any one’s “looks”.

47 posted on 06/26/2010 7:43:03 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson