Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Changes Course on Ship; Israel Trains for the Worst..
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/138217 ^ | June 22nd, 2010

Posted on 06/23/2010 11:45:17 AM PDT by TaraP

Iran has changed course again and announced Tuesday afternoon it will send a ship to try to challenge Israeli sovereignty over the waters off of Hamas-controlled Gaza, as was agreed in the Oslo Accords.

One day earlier, Iran backed down, saying that the sailing was being put off indefinitely. No reason was given for either announcement, but the resumption of the plan to risk a confrontation with the Israeli Navy came the same day that efforts were intensified in Lebanon for two ships to set out for Gaza.

Analysts have pointed out that despite its verbal bravado, the Islamic Republic’s navy is the weakest part of its armed forces. However, Israel is preparing for the worst, and commandos are training for the prospect of meeting up with Iranian suicide bombers on the high seas.

"No one in their right mind can believe that a ship sent by the ayatollahs and their Revolutionary Guards has anything to do with humanitarian aid," said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor. "I don't think there is one single country in this region and beyond that would let such an ayatollah ship come near its coasts."

The prospect of U.S. warships being involved was played down by Newsweek magazine, which reported Tuesday that Saturday’s movement through the Suez Canal of the American warships, led by the giant aircraft carrier USS Truman, was unconnected with an Iranian attempt to reach Gaza.

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaza; iran; israel; usstruman

1 posted on 06/23/2010 11:45:19 AM PDT by TaraP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Sounds like a little disarray in the Iranian government.

2 posted on 06/23/2010 11:47:29 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
reported Tuesday that Saturday’s movement through the Suez Canal of the American warships, led by the giant aircraft carrier USS Truman, was unconnected with an Iranian attempt to reach Gaza.

Then why are they going!?! It was eleven ships, right? Any military folks out there have an opinion?

3 posted on 06/23/2010 11:47:45 AM PDT by Pete (exponential problems require exponential solutions : 29thday.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Deep sea sinking would be in order. Nobody to raise the ship and determine who sunk it, except for the U.S. and I don’t think we would do that.


4 posted on 06/23/2010 11:48:53 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

“.. led by the giant aircraft carrier USS Truman, was unconnected with an Iranian attempt to reach Gaza.”

Let’s hope they fight for the right side....


5 posted on 06/23/2010 12:01:43 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Iran thinks they want to tangle with Israel.

Someone needs to remind them: Be very, very careful what you wish for; you just may get it.


6 posted on 06/23/2010 12:01:53 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Bombing practice for the Israeli Air Force??


7 posted on 06/23/2010 12:11:05 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Two or three submarine torpedoes, well off shore.

I’m getting sick of watching clown cars, and I’m tired of good people being hurt.


8 posted on 06/23/2010 12:13:26 PM PDT by benewton (Life sucks, then you die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Israeli sub will sink it — far, far away from cameras.

“Gee, I wonder what happened to it. It’s just gone...”


9 posted on 06/23/2010 12:14:01 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pete

I’m not in the military, but 11 ships centered around a carrier sounds like a Carrier Battle Group. They’re probably going to relieve another CVBG in the Persian Gulf or somewhere close by. This is not a big deal, yet.


10 posted on 06/23/2010 12:16:35 PM PDT by paladin1_dcs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pete; TaraP

I’m so cynical about Zero and his demonstrably anti-Israel stance that I’m now envisioning our ships acting as escorts/protection for the Iranian ships! Would Israel attack the Iranians if our ships were nearby?


11 posted on 06/23/2010 12:17:33 PM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoyjoyfromNJ

“our” ships are nearby, and Iran is acting in confidence.

Shows their belief of what America will do....”nothing, nada, zip”,
“Heck! They are on our side against the jew... ask brother Obama!”


12 posted on 06/23/2010 12:57:08 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
One day earlier, Iran backed down, saying that the sailing was being put off indefinitely. No reason was given for either announcement, but the resumption of the plan to risk a confrontation with the Israeli Navy came the same day that efforts were intensified in Lebanon for two ships to set out for Gaza.

"Imadinnerjacket? Yeah, it's me, Baraq. Look, before they drag me outta here and hang my treasonous behind from the nearest lamp post, this is gonna be your best shot at taking out our mutual Zionist enemy, or at least having a reasonable chance of bringing about the return of our Mahdi, so go ahead and launch those tubs. I promise, I won't allow the Yankee dogs in my Imperialist Navy to do a thing."


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

13 posted on 06/23/2010 1:15:09 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
The prospect of U.S. warships being involved was played down by Newsweek magazine, which reported Tuesday that Saturday’s movement through the Suez Canal of the American warships, led by the giant aircraft carrier USS Truman, was unconnected with an Iranian attempt to reach Gaza.

That's not the same as saying that the Iranian postment and then reinstatement of their "mission" did not have anything to do with the Truman group passing through the canal.

These guys may be suicide bombers, but they'd like to get a little closer to the target before being blown up. And they'd like to do the blowing up, not have the US Navy do it for them.

14 posted on 06/23/2010 1:43:27 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
"Then why are they going!?!"

This may be a result of the increasing overall tensions but still unrelated to the blockade.

15 posted on 06/23/2010 1:44:27 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

16 posted on 06/23/2010 4:15:32 PM PDT by SJackson (most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it, M Sanger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson