Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
I'm confused...can someone tell me what exactly it was that McChrystal said that was so damning? I read the entire Rolling Stone article and didn't see anything that would warrant resigning or being let go. The only thing I saw was something an aide said -

According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal ...thought Obama looked "uncomfortable and intimidated" by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn't go much better. "It was a 10-minute photo op," says an adviser to McChrystal. Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was. Here's the guy who's going to run his fucking war, but he didn't seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed."

WTF?
68 posted on 06/23/2010 12:06:46 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (I'll just say the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is there for a reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky9teen

Exactly. McChrystal, is responsible for the article tho, trouble goes uphill as well as accountablity. His men were loose cannons and that his how they roll. It is evident that he has problems with Politicians, and policy. Knowing it, and allowing it to be said nationally, put the ball in Obamas court to show who was in charge. Stan knew this, and rather than let this drag out, for the good of the men, morale, and in respect for the office, not the man, but the office, he resigned. At least that IMO.


118 posted on 06/23/2010 1:20:41 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson