Another question, when did claims & concepts become the rule of law? When was that codified?
Dual citizenship was expressly denied by positive law formally in 1783 under the treaty of Peace wherein it states that the colonists who took an oath to the revolution in direct opposition to the English monarchy were from that point on aliens and could no longer inherit from the English and visa versa. The American colonists were aliens and were NOT to be held as subjects to the foreign government any longer, but being the tyrannical government the crown was, they reneged on that treaty & thus the Americans were forced into the war of 1812 between the Brits & the French. Their mistake, falling for the same trick they did in 1783. It was finally formalized int he treaty immediately following the 1868 Expatriation Act.
I don’t answer your questions because I think you are nuts.
SOMEONE has to be the final interpreter of what words and phrases mean, and that role has been taken, right or wrong, by the courts. Since the Constitution doesn’t define NBC, someone has to...and YOU don’t get to do so.
I agree - we do not approve of dual citizenship, although we do acknowledge it exists. However, if someone refuses to acknowledge the claim of the other country - as is the case with Obama - then we consider them to be American only...hence the War of 1812.
What is your point? Do you agree that Obama is American, and only American?