To: kristinn
So we’re going to let a stupid article by a stupid “journalist” in the Rolling Stone determine our policy in Afghanistan? Brilliant! And we wonder why we’re ineffective?
5 posted on
06/22/2010 2:55:20 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
To: popdonnelly
Nah, Obama has never been hit so directly with dissent. He can’t handle it. But he’s gonna have to get used to it because other countries also get a say, or they too could withdraw from helping Obama...
9 posted on
06/22/2010 2:57:24 PM PDT by
Freddd
(CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
To: popdonnelly
So were going to let a stupid article by a stupid journalist in the Rolling Stone determine our policy in Afghanistan? Brilliant! And we wonder why were ineffective?
Yeah, you are right. But why for the life of me did McChrystal allow this guy to roam around as he did? Whatever you think of the Obama (and we almost all believe his administration is a ship of fools) team, McChrystal was very foolish in this situation.
34 posted on
06/22/2010 3:11:35 PM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson