I appreciate your point of view.
I also disagree with it.
There are several mechanisms by which Obama can be removed. Impeachment is but one of them.
You need to do some more research on the issue. You are on the right track, but we the people DO have at least two other options. SCOTUS can and will have to be involved.
The cases are proceeding.
The other option is not at all attractive, and is a lot more violent. I am not into that option AT ALL. This is why I am supportive of the legal cases which are, as I said, proceeding.
You are correct, especially those mechanisms enumerated in Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, which allow the Vice President and Officers of the Executive Branch to declare the President unable to serve. Whereupon both houses of congress must concur with a 2/3 majority.
And of course, The President may resign, no doubt in shame, or fearing Impeachment and Conviction, after the Writs of Quo Warranto wend their way to the SCOTUS on appeal, and he is declared ineligible. (By that time, Kagan, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and a utility communist yet to be named, will be joined by Fidel and Raoul Castro, Lula, Hugo Chavez, and Evo Morales.)
These alternative options will be exercised during Kazakhstan's Flying Pig Festival during an August blizzard.
I agree that the court cases must continue at all costs and against all odds. But beyond sending financial and moral support to the real lawyers and plaintiffs involved, IMHO, the energy of the base might just be more profitably directed to the strategy for the next two years, for some part of which, probably all, we will continue under the chaotic rule of the Prepostor and his Band of Communists and Thieves.
Part of our energy must also be spent at the state level, keeping Obama off state ballots on eligibility grounds, for which there already is ample precedent, but no political will. Obama, with the massive support he enjoys in the big states, must be prevented from even thinking of running again.