Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac
I certainly do, thanks for asking! It is a bit counter-intuitive, but it is true. The following is from Reason magazine, October 1995. It quotes a study from The New England Journal of Medicine as well as some studies from the University of Alabama:

Rodu, chairman of the oral pathology department at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, notes that oral cancer is the only major, well-established health risk associated with the use of smokeless tobacco (and even that disease is twice as common among smokers). A 1981 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine found an oral-cancer rate of 26 per 100,000 among long-term users of smokeless tobacco, compared to 6 per 100,000 among nonusers. Noting that the survival rate for oral cancer is 50 percent, Rodu estimates that "if all 46 million smokers used smokeless tobacco instead, the United States would see, at worst, 6,000 deaths from oral cancer [a year], versus the current 419,000 deaths from smoking-related cancers, heart problems, and lung disease." (Emphasis in original.) By this measure, he concludes, smokeless tobacco is 98 percent safer than smoking. Rodu and his colleagues estimate that life expectancy for a 35-year-old smokeless-tobacco user is 80.9, virtually the same as for nonusers. The average 35-year-old smoker, by contrast, lives to be 73.1.

72 posted on 06/21/2010 5:40:47 PM PDT by shempy (BOYCOTT GM & CHRYSLER - support American VALUES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: shempy
Rather an old study.

Smokeless tobacco is much more prevalent today and growing. It may be time for a new study.

74 posted on 06/21/2010 5:55:24 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson