Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea Might Have Tested Fusion Process (Possible Small Nuke Test)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 06/21/10 | Ju Yong-joong

Posted on 06/20/2010 7:31:17 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my excerpts

N. Korea Might Have Tested Fusion Process

Ju Yong-joong

Two days after May 12 announcement, eight times the normal level of radioactive substance Xenon was detected

Government kept it under wraps

It has been revealed on June 20 that the northern most monitoring station under Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) detected eight times the normal level of radioactive substance Xenon right after N. Korea announced on May 12 that it had successful nuclear fusion process, key technology to make hydrogen bomb. It is raising the possibility that N. Korea actually conducted a small-scale nuclear test (required) for (triggering) nuclear fusion.

The government sources said, "Two days after the N. Korean announcement (May 14,) air sample collected at Geojin station located at Kosung, Kangwon Province, showed 8 times the normal level of Xenon after run through Xenon analyzer. It is my understanding that the relevant organization and authorities conducted in-depth investigation." Xenon, along with Krypton, is gaseous radioactive substance which is regarded as the clearest evidence of nuclear test because it is inert. In 2006, a few days after N. Korea's nuclear test at Punggye-ri, Gilju, N. Korea, (S. Korean) government also announced that Xenon had been detected.

/end my excerpts

(Excerpt) Read more at news.chosun.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nkorea; nuclearfusion; nuketest; xenon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2010 7:31:20 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Expect the Obama administration to take bold, decisive action.

Against Israel...

2 posted on 06/20/2010 7:33:46 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thank you for all your post. I may not reply but I always read what you have to say.


3 posted on 06/20/2010 7:34:11 PM PDT by eastforker (.If you design an idiot proof gadget, society will just build a better idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
... that N. Korea actually conducted a small-scale nuclear test (required) for (triggering) nuclear fusion."

In other words, the North Korean crazies are trying to make a hydrogen bomb (megaton yield city busters.)

4 posted on 06/20/2010 7:34:27 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

P!


5 posted on 06/20/2010 7:35:10 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

So let me see if I have this right...

On or about May 12, the Norks conducted some sort of test that involved a release of Xenon gas, and may (or may not) have been a test of a nuclear trigger of some sort.

And it took over a month for this to get out??

What does this really mean, was this actually a nuclear weapons test of some sort, and if so, what is the significance of the presence of Xenon gas??

As I understand it, a fusion weapon is a multi-stage thermonuclear “device” and is an extremely sophisticated animal indeed. From what I understand it takes a fission weapon to generate enough heat and pressure to allow the fusion to take place. I wonder if the Norks are actually capable of that level of nuclear weapons development given what we know they have at their disposal, and considering the level of scrutiny they have been under since we found out about the A.Q. Khan network. Are they really working on triggers??

I do not want to minimize an actual threat, but I am reluctant to go running around with my hair on fire over this either....


6 posted on 06/20/2010 7:44:12 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Hmmmm. The fission bomb didn't go boom, and now they're working on a much more complex fusion bomb?

Perhaps the first test wasn't the failure of an atomic bomb, but the success of a neutron bomb.

Is there a new-que-lar physicist in the house who can tell us if a release of xenon and krypton is consistant with tests of an effects booster for a neutron bomb?

7 posted on 06/20/2010 7:44:39 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 514 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
TRL,

You and AIT are great “Coast Watchers’ for us in CONUS. Thank you.

Am always somewhat suspicious of claims of “small” DPRK tests.

Hiroshima-sized weapons (especially the pie-and-wedge kind) are childsplay as long as you have the U235 or Pu, but making small bombs is much more difficult.

? Your thoughts ?

8 posted on 06/20/2010 7:47:03 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

BTTT


9 posted on 06/20/2010 7:49:01 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Isn’t a fusion device a tad bit beyond the capability of the North and their limited reactors? Yet this article is saying they tested the fission component of such a weapon??? Are the Russians feeding them materials?


10 posted on 06/20/2010 7:50:29 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Not necessarily. One of the reasons for a small-time nuke aspirant to go to a two-stage weapon (aka ‘hydrogen bomb’) is that you get “more bang for your buck” — ie higher efficiency in the mass->energy reaction. Another reason is that you can create “dial-a-boom” bombs where you have a way of adjusting the yield in the field.

All that aside, once they get a workable two-stage design, you can bet the farm that the Chiapet dictator will peddle the design hither and yon. Trying to deal with the ramifications at the point will be like trying to put smoke in a bottle....


11 posted on 06/20/2010 7:52:50 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Worrisome, but they will have to deliver it with a semi...


12 posted on 06/20/2010 7:52:54 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Someone somewhere took over the remains of the Japanese atomic weapon project ~ which was mostly in what is now North Korea.

The allies never found out the extent of the operations because we'd traded away half of Korea and Sakhalin Island to the Russians to join the Pacific War.

No one even has a good idea what the Japanese bomb game plans were, or what all the methodologies might be that they figured would work.

Their work was sufficiently advanced they had people on site in Japan who were able to determine that we'd hit them with both a Uranium Bomb and a Plutonium Bomb.

One possibility with respect to the old Japanese program is that they may have gone straight to work to develop a suitable fission trigger for a fusion bomb ~ so maybe this is it.

Earlier Korean atom bomb claims and results suggest strongly they have been building nothing more than a fission trigger!

13 posted on 06/20/2010 7:56:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

If they already have a working nuclear bomb I don’t see what the advantages of upgrading to a fusion weapon would be. It doesn’t make them higher on the intimidation scale, just lower on resources. Either the Xenon is a decay product of something else or they are just testing the outer limits of crazy.


14 posted on 06/20/2010 7:57:54 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Actually, the reports of a Japanese Atomic project were vastly overstated. They were primarily the results of the fictional work of a US writer and our desire to suspect the Sovs of almost anything.

Any work the Japanese scientists, and there were a number of good ones, has been far surpassed with 1960s public knowledge.

Give any sophomore physics student a decent diameter stainless tube, some Pu, some Octol and a few other things I won't go into here, and he can make a fission weapon.

15 posted on 06/20/2010 8:07:28 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

TRL = TLR

as in Tiger Rikes Looster!

Sorry, my FUBAR

:)


16 posted on 06/20/2010 8:11:04 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If they tested a fusion weapon underground, it would have been picked up by USGS seismometers
17 posted on 06/20/2010 8:46:31 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Irrespective of how "overstated" the Japanese efforts may have been we have before us our own first steps. In a single meeting preparatory to the initiation of the Manhattan Project the theoreticians sat down and came up with over half a dozen ways they thought a thermo-nuclear weapon could be made.

We only used two of the ways ~ and both worked.

The Japanese were certainly in the same league as the fellows who started our own program although they were lacking equipment and reactors, et al, and there were a lot fewer of them. Still, the thoughts were there.

Many of the Manhattan Project notes have been made public over the years and folks have commented on them. Not too many years back in a reference to one of the Japanese physicists from WWII (who'd long since died/disappeared and was not around to defend his work) some (not just one, "some") of the popular science magazines reported that current day physicists thought he may have gotten off on a "bad track" where you could devise a bomb but it would tend to be low yield ~ but maybe it could be used to trigger something else.

Slim thread obviously, but the Korean nuclear program has been typified by stuff that maybe kind of seems to work but is otherwise low yield.

It's doing something or they'd not keep dumping money into it. Now, if they're on the track to make a fusion bomb, we probaby ought to start worrying about it.

18 posted on 06/21/2010 4:07:36 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thank you for the ping.


19 posted on 06/21/2010 4:26:37 AM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( garden/survival/cooking/storage- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2299939/posts?page=5555)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; milford421; Velveeta; WestCoastGal; Rushmore Rocks; LibertyRocks; PGalt

Ping.


20 posted on 06/21/2010 4:30:38 AM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( garden/survival/cooking/storage- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2299939/posts?page=5555)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson