I'm not talking about his vote. I'm talking about they way his recent comments are not accurately depicted in the headline.
"...when the civilian officials, the President or the Congress, give an order, a directive, its followed, and its followed to a tee. Thats what youre expected to do. And if you cant do that, then you shouldnt be in the service and you shouldnt be wearing the uniform. Its as simple as that."
What part of that has you confused, and how is the headline (Soldiers Who Cannot Comply With DADT Repeal 'Shouldn't Be In The Service') the slightest bit inaccurate?
Take your time...