Posted on 06/18/2010 12:35:54 PM PDT by jazusamo
The “myth” of judicial impartiality is too often just a myth.
Judges can be political creatures, too.
Obama, the banana republic dictator in chief chalks up another victory for his corrupt regime. Thanks for posting this jaz.
One of the “Magnificent Seven” who took it upon themselves to appoint the political cases to themselves so they could protect the corrupt democrats from legal consequences of their crimes.
I guess Roberts says that nobody can be caught at a crime unless the law in question tells exactly how the crime is to be discovered and prosecuted.
Can this guy wipe his butt without a law telling him how to do it?
Remembered you said you were following this, it’s not good news.
Most welcome and you stated that well.
Federal Judges are notoriously drawn from the pool of political hack lawyers who help Senators get elected (i.e. raise campaign money).. It is the Senator of the same party as the President who figures out who the President should appoint. If both Senators are opposite party, then they fall back to ranking House members. Some districts have sham panels to judge “excellence” but the candidates are all hacks.
This case doesn’t need a civil suit with a district judge. It needs a grand jury and a special prosecutor.
This will be revisited along with many other issues by the new Congress which I pray will impeach Obama and try him for treason.
Ah the ole “yeah? so what” ruling...
Agreed, it looks like it’s the only way justice will be served.
A cheap, political hack judge. What could Halpin have expected?
I love how everyone dealing with this ILLEGAL REGIME thinks they are going to get LEGAL justice.
Doesn’t Walpin realize this?
Doesn’t Gov. Jan Brewer realize this?
Doesn’t Gov. Jindal realize this?
Walpin, Brewer, Jindal and Governors suing over Obamacare should demand Quo Warranto.
You’re right. Spot on.
—
Welcome to New Kenya! (Africa U.S.A.)
“Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land.” /sarcasm (sort of)
He should write a book.
I’m getting to the point where violence seems the only answer to this corrupt government.
AND lose his own soul?
I would think not. At 78, if like me, he fears not going to heaven more than anything else.
Defending my life against a killer that wants to take it is one thing...I could do that, but for revenge over losing a job, no.
Going through the courts is fine, going postal is not.
JMHO as usual.
From the article:
“Walpin said in an e-mail to POLITICO Friday he disagrees with the ruling and is considering what to do next. ‘We are disappointed in the decision, believe it is erroneous, and are reviewing it and our options,’ he said.”
Hopefully, quo warranto will be one of those options.
Leo Donofrio was very keen on having a plaintiff, such as Walpin, contact him to test the quo warranto statute against a sitting president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.