Everything the commie/RATS come up with smacks/smells of totaliarnism. beware!!!!!!
I admit I don’t understand all this crap.
What if these folks go offshore?
FreeDominion changed their server to the Republic of Panama because of Panama’s laws...all secret, which is on par with their banking laws; therefore, FD is no longer being harassed by their government crooks.
Just asking where the problem is. Changing servers to another country (Panama) is not a problem.
Honestly who gives a damn. In Nov this BUM won’t be able to do a damn thing. It will be a bloodbath. They are all going.
The list, ping
Kinda funny, that the FCC can give itself greater power over an information/communication service by reclassifying it from information to communication. Shouldn’t Congress, or some other body independent of the FCC, do the classifying, since it is inherently in the FCC’s self-interest to classify various media as communication services?
"All filings related to this Notice should refer to GN Docket No. 10-127. Further, we strongly encourage parties to develop responses to this Notice that adhere to the organization and structure of this Notice"
No regime likes free speech of the people. No regime leaves the press free of state influence. The Net changed that for a time, and to be honest I expected this to happen sooner.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/thirdway/index
#
Quote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/68003
“FCC Moves to Regulate Internet—Even Though the Law Calls for Internet to be ‘Unfettered by Federal or State Regulation’”
Friday, June 18, 2010
By Matt Cover, Staff Writer
(CNSNews.com) –
SNIPPET: “This last approach, presented at the hearing as the “third way,” is the preferred avenue of Genachowski, who unveiled the plan in May.
The “third way” approach would still allow the government the authority to heavily regulate the Internet because it would be classified as a telecom service. However, under this approach, the FCC claims it will exercise “forbearance,” a regulatory doctrine whereby the government promises not use its regulatory authority in most cases.
Commissioner Michael Copps, at the FCC, sought to frame the issue in terms of consumer protection, claiming that “consumers find themselves in quite a box” because government, he claimed, had been “all but shorn” of the authority to regulate Internet service.
Copps said he was “worried” about relying purely on the private sector for Internet-based innovation, saying that the problems of such an approach could be seen in the 2008 financial collapse and the recent Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
“We need to reclaim our authority,” Copps said.”