It’s revealing that you take my detailing of Bush43’s behavior regarding illegal immigration to be ‘attacking’ him. You aren’t accusing me of falsely representing what he did, because I’m not. It can only be an attack if accurately describing his behavior reveals that he was doing something which he shouldn’t. Which I agree is exactly what he was doing. He took an oath to enforce our laws. But he ran for the office hinting in a number of speeches that he had no intention of enforcing our border laws. And he lived down to his hints.
Reagan did nothing like that. He didn’t run for office stating that “family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande”. I’ll condemn Reagan’s amnesty, but Reagan the man possessed a far better character than the duplicitous oath-scorning Bush43.
I am NOT accusing you of any false statements.
All I am accusing you of is hypocrisy when you denigrate Bush43 for lack of stopping illegal immigration while you never mention Reagan who actually gave amnesty to millions of illegals. Bush43 never gave amnesty to illegals.
So to be non-hypocritical, and un-biased, it is important to state that Bush43 was no good on illegals issue, and Reagan was worse.
They all suck on this issue. Even Palin was singing the same tune during her campaign with McCain. It has nothing to do with their character. It has everything to do with being SOFT ON THE ILLEGALS ISSUE.
So you see, I am an equal opportunity basher of ALL politicians who are soft on the illegals issue. If I was the president, I would round up every employer who hired illegals and throw them in prison for collusion to break US immigration laws. That will result in a mass emigration of illegals out of the United States.