Posted on 06/16/2010 10:43:40 PM PDT by neverdem
MEPs have called for nanosilver and long multiwalled carbon nanotubes to be banned in electrical and electronic products. Members of the EU Environment Committee made the call as they voted on proposed amendments to the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive.
Their stance on nanomaterials was in addition to the EU proposals, and as well as asking for these two to be banned, they said that any electrical and electronic materials that contained nanomaterials of any nature should be labelled as such. Manufacturers would be compelled to provide the European Commission with safety data on any nanomaterials used.
Nano nonsense?
It remains unclear precisely what the MEPs deem to be nanomaterials. If they follow the definition used in the Novel Foods directive, then it would mean any material engineered or manufactured to be of the order of 100nm in at least one dimension. This, however, would lead to every electronic product requiring labelling.
|
Nanomaterials such as nanosilver and carbon nanotubes could be banned from electronic equipment
|
'Every transistor in a computer chip would then include a hazardous substance,' explains Steffi Friedrichs, director general of the international Nanotechnology Industries Association. 'Labelling is an understandable consumer demand, but it needs to be practical, and labelling every computer chip would be nonsensical.'
There is little doubt that nanosilver is damaging to the environment, but first it has to get there, says Steffen Foss Hansen of the Technical University of Denmark's department of environmental engineering. 'To end up in the environment, it first has to become waste, and as there is a take-back policy in the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive, I question whether it would end up in the environment from these uses,' he says. 'It would be a lot more effective to look at the personal care products that we know will end up in the environment.'
The sense behind banning long multiwalled carbon nanotubes is more apparent; for example, there is some evidence that they may behave like asbestos when inhaled. But even then, the nanotubes have to be free for inhalation, which would not be the case if they were bound up in an electrical product. 'The properties of each material must be evaluated according to application, and on a case-by-case basis,' says Friedrichs. 'In final products, the potential exposure to carbon nanotubes is negligible, and during the manufacture and formulation process adherence to safety standards is essential. However, we support further research into the environmental, health and safety aspects of carbon nanotubes.'
A vote on the proposals is due to take place in October.
When asked exactly what a nanomaterial was, the Euro Minister replied “I know it when I can’t see it.”
LOL. Especially if it’s fabricated from buffoonium.
Like the scare over asbestos, most of which was unable to do any harm sitting where it was.
Treatment with naturally occurring protein prevents and reverses brain damage caused by meningitis
Startling Scientists, Plant Fixes Its Flawed Gene interesting moldy oldy
Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Nah. In California, we have Prop 65 labels on every office building, gas pump, factory and store in the State. Throughout the nation, we have mile-a-minute FedEx guy disclaimers on almost every radio commercial. Every ladder sold has at least 10 different stickers plastered to it. What's a few more labels on every electronic gadget sold in the land? Just think of all the lives this do-gooderism saves. It saves only one life, it must be worth it!
The purpose of these labeling requirements IMHO is to please campaign donors who happen to have large companies which can afford the added expense of additional labeling. They can afford to jump through the hoops of testing and qualifying their products for the labels. The benefit to them is that smaller competitors cannot afford to do it and get regulated out of existance.
C.S. Lewis
The sky is falling; give us more guvvermints!
The EU is irrelevant, and becoming more so every day; watch for war!
.
“Especially if it’s fabricated from buffoonium.”
.
Shhhhh! - Buffoonium is strategic, and classified; how did you know it exists? Who are you? I have a right to know.
.
“The benefit to them is that smaller competitors cannot afford to do it and get regulated out of existance.”
.
Yep, basically the same ploy the pharma-poison vendors and the FDA use to hamper natural herbal food supplements.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.