I don’t know what part of my statement you say is false but here is a link to her.
http://www.asqde.org/SRLines/SandraRLines.htm
She has sworn affidavits in some eligibility court cases and testified in other eligibility cases. In each one she has declared the Hawaiian colb to be false.
lots of ingenerous bashing for our country’s savior today !
After a year of search he has finally provided proof of his stay in Mombasa: PLANTAINS EXIST IN KENYA. I wish to make a short resume of Lucas’ proofs of his visit to Mombasa on Feb 19th 2009:
1 The University of Ghent Belgium has 2 Chief Administrators,
2 Plantains are known in Kenya
3 A bar in New Zealand serves Obama faced Sushi
4 Barack sr. and Dr. Ang’awa both shared the same city allthough in different years. Nairobi
5 Kenya has tribal languages
6 Ancient Egyptian hyerogliphics were “pictures” and so Knyans use different name spellings
and some still doubt him ?
Well, I’ve already posted this about a million times, but what the hey!
***
From TRSOL
However, the bigger story to this lawsuit is the fact that forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines has documented in an associated affidavit (PDF) the following:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/executedsandralinesdeclaration_1.pdf
2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik,” [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received.
After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.
3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.
4. In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all.
The above clearly illustrates that it is impossible to determine eligibility based on the widely-circulated certification of live birth and that the only way to determine Barack Hussein Obama’s natural born citizenship status is to retrieve the currently-sealed certificate of live birth.
In her affidavit she does not say the Hawaiian COLB is fraudulent. She says it could be and the tools exist to make such things. But ultimately you can't make the call from a picture of a document. You need the actual document.
From her affidavit:
“4. In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all.”
Though I disagree that it would lay anything to rest. Birthers would just move on to their next talking point or simple pretend it never happened.