That is an incorrect statement. The people who made those declarations claimed expertise they do not have, and have been debunked by others with the actual expertise they claim. But be that as it may, I have repeatedly stated that these lawsuits are a waste of time, not because I like Obama, but because they have no realistic possibility of framing an actionable case that can succeed. They are simply fertile ground for con men (and woman).
If you want to do something constructive, work to put in place laws in your state that mandate how qualifications for the Presidential ballot are verified. Properly constructed, such laws could get the authorizing official in your state a peek at actual documentation transmitted by the state of Hawaii. That will yield some official verdict, which is what Birthers claim to want. I have not mocked and will not mock anyone trying to do that. That is a reasonable activity to try in a representative democracy. This other stuff isn't.
Arizona has passed such a law. Several other states, including my own, are working on a like law. Their are Federal laws that state such but were not followed in this case.
you said “That is an incorrect statement. The people who made those declarations claimed expertise they do not have, and have been debunked by others with the actual expertise they claim.”
Sorry but your statement is not accurate. While Dr Pollack was viciously attacked and his reputation sullied by obots, his work was not debunked. Sandra R Lines has many years working for the feds as a forensic document examiner without a negative. She has declared the Hawaiian colb to be fraudulent. There are others.