Posted on 06/16/2010 2:32:22 PM PDT by fathers1
I hope this woman ends up owning that town.
**I hope this woman ends up owning that town.**
Ditto... I’m watching a fried go thru this... it’s not pretty!!
This whole situation is horrible and I agree, I hope she owns the town.
Way to go mom and dad, teach your children to lie to at such a young age......shame on those adults.....
Just like the McMartin case ...
Me too.
That's the only salvation I can think of regarding old Mike Wallace.....he totally exploded the silliness of that case on Sixty Minutes.
Tonya Craft?
Is that the company that built the FailBoat for that reality show girly?
Good.
Thou shalt not conjure false witness against thy neighbor.
Anybody remember the Wenatchee, WA “sex ring” case? Same sort of stuff, maybe worse. Eventually the accused sued the city and won. Several lives were already ruined though.
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=7065
I am pleased to see this outcome.
She fought the case, in court, the AMERICAN WAY, and won.
Now she can make those who CONSPIRED TO FILE FALSE CHARGES pay.
I’m with you
During my divorce the Mother Protection agency- oops I mean child protective services was presented with the following:
1) Child playing unsuprvised on swingset - found hanging by her neck (Filed against Mother by neighbor who saved her)
2) Children playing in street where semi-trucks travel (against mother by neighborS )
3) Child hospitalized from neglect and diaper rash so severe she was bleeding and infected- needed surgery (against mother by hospital)
4) Child missed surgery because they were unsupervised and ate a stick of butter -because no food in the house. (against mother by doctors ofice)
5) Children called father to report they had no food and were starving (against mother by police report)
6) Children (all little girls) covered in bug bites from sleeping on filthy floor (filed against mother by father only AFTER judge said “it must not be child abused if father did not file a complaint” with CPS)
7) FIVE seperate incidents of child coming home with diaper rash so severe she was bleeding
8) Child slapped (filed against FATHER by mother, 2 days after court doctor recommended she not have custody due to mental illness and children were placed with father)
Guess which one caused CPS to rush into action and say “we are going to put the children with their mother until we complete our investigation”
This is AFTER her older boy was removed from her by CPS after 14 (FOURTEEN!!!!) seperate incidents in another town (before I met here- i never knew until the trial) Including being left unsupervised with a dog that ripped his face open
Oh and guess who the Judge awarded custody to? (Hint: she was DIAGNOSED by the JUDGES OWN COURT-APPOINTED DOCTOR AS A PSYCHOPATH (Borderline Personality Disorder- look it up)
Enough to make you grab your shotgun and clean house. Yes, I’m serious.
Unreal!
Unfortunately, I know it’s all too real.
How does one decide to marry a psychopath? Or, how does one decide to marry one they know so little about that they could be an undetected psychopath?
I know, I know...There were never even the slightest hints of anything potentially wrong with her prior to marriage...
I’m so sorry but not surprised. And to anyone who reads and thinks you are exaggerating has not had the misfortune of dealing with CPS on any level!
None.
Sadly, the uninvolved taxpayer foots the bill. What needs to happen is the removal of sovereign immunity. Sovereign immunity may make sense for jobs related to job security and matters of the state (police, fire, emergency, etc), but all these social services have been traditionally the work of the private sector and charity. These SEIU types get overpaid and overprotected. They have an unfair advantage over the private sector.
Take those liars to the cleaners.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.