[Ro_Thunder]

stormer wrote:

Secondly, this is (nominally) a news photo - she’s a public figure (literally) in a public place - it isn’t “child porn”.

Well, all those mid-80’s/early-90’s videos of Traci Lords were done with her permission, assistance, and financially beneficial to her; doesn’t not make them child porn.

It is porn, or it isn’t porn, period.

Any porn with someone under 18 is CHILD porn.

[stormer]

I don’t know how old you are, but there is a very famous, Pulitzer Prize winning photograph from the Vietnam war by photographer Nick Ut of a young girl named Kim Phuc. Events that take place in public cannot be compared to the work of Traci Lords.

[hummingbird]

"she’s a public figure (literally) in a public place - it isn’t “child porn”."

============================

she's a "pubic" figure in a "pubic" place.

I've always feared the typo of using the word "pubic" rather than "public" so I get a little nervous around the word "public".

I think I'm okay here because I mean to type "pubic"!