To: Palter
Eminent conservatives, such as David Frum and David Brooks Stopped right there. Anyone who takes seriously that these two clown are eminent or conservative is clueless.
4 posted on
06/15/2010 7:49:40 AM PDT by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
To: Huck
That is part of the ‘intellectual’, lol, framing who or what a person is.
6 posted on
06/15/2010 7:51:01 AM PDT by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
To: Huck
I almost stopped reading it but the article actually ends well. This wasn’t meant for Tea Party people this was meant for the “elite” to read.
To: Huck
It stopped me for a moment as well.
28 posted on
06/15/2010 8:21:18 AM PDT by
RedMDer
(Throw them all out in 2010... Forward with Confidence! Forward!)
To: Huck
If conservative means to conserve the status quo of diminishing individual liberty, enormous Federal government, and perpetual foreign wars, I suppose Frum and Brooks are good conservatives.
If conservative means something like Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan thought it meant, Frum and Brooks fail.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson