Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Telepathic Intruder

I heard this mention during the first few days. It would be very controlled and just seal the leak. I wonder if BP doesn’t want it sealed so it can be used in the future? I am not that educated on the subject but a small, controlled nuke sounds like it would do a lot less damage to the environment than all this oil. Plus you wouldn’t have to add so many solvents to the water. I think people hear the word “nuke” and they think about some huge mushroom cloud. It could have been done at night and that would have been that.


49 posted on 06/15/2010 5:39:56 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: momtothree
It would be very controlled and just seal the leak.

Now, who do you think would be in charge of inserting a nuclear weapon into the ground?

Would it be the new CZAR Obama is appointing? How well do you really think that will go?

Since the fragile nature of the sea floor in that area is one of the main problems they are already dealing with, why would you think that it would just seal the leak, and not cause an even larger one?

89 posted on 06/15/2010 8:39:03 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: momtothree

When y’all figure out how to get it past the BOP let me know.


96 posted on 06/15/2010 9:29:06 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson