Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray
LOTS more infant mortality back then.

Yeah. I read 30 to 40%. I can't imagine the heartbreak.

So the comparison between her and sixteen year olds a century back is less misleading that you might think.

Not really but if you wanna go with that, fine. You should read mortality sheets. Plenty of teens died of mysterious ailments. Women died in childbirth. There were no guarantees and medicine was not what it is now. It isn't the infant mortality rate that made life expectancy 40 yrs old.

80 posted on 06/14/2010 8:03:21 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW

“Yeah. I read 30 to 40%. I can’t imagine the heartbreak”

That was basically the plot setup of that movie “The Yearling”. Kid was the sole survivor of mom’s 4 children. It was a believeable plotline back then.


95 posted on 06/14/2010 8:19:46 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson