Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

Opinion. Look pretty close to being right, though.

Sixteen years old is only a “child” in our warped day and age. A century ago...

In any case, we’re going to disagree, no matter what.


58 posted on 06/14/2010 7:43:43 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
Sixteen years old is only a “child” in our warped day and age. A century ago...

In 1850 the life expectancy was 40. I looked it up. Our ancestors didn't have time to be kids at 16. Life expectancy now is 77.7 years. Comparing her with 16 year olds from our history is misleading.

65 posted on 06/14/2010 7:49:41 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson