Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975
"Mariners have a fundamental duty to render assistance to other mariners in distress."

Didn't say they didn't maybe you are misunderstaning. I am saying someone should pay for the costs associated with such. And if I am understanding the situation are they not asking for payment now?

130 posted on 06/14/2010 8:50:53 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

The Australian government has made it quite clear it will not be asking for payment because that is not how the system works. As I’ve said.

This is a duty under the traditions of the sea and the laws of the sea. It is not appropriate to expect payment.

I have said in other threads that I believe it would be appropriate for the Sunderlands to make a donation to either the Australian Volunteer Coastguard, or the Société Nationale de Sauvetage en Mer, or some similar organisation. I would also certainly not object to the idea of them offering to reimburse some or all of the costs of the French fishing vessel. But it must not be expected. It must be their choice.

Sailors need to go to the aid of other sailors, whether expense is incurred or not. If that ever breaks down, it will cost life after life after life.


131 posted on 06/14/2010 9:09:31 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson