[jocon307]

Oh puhleeze, this poor woman. She sounds like that rare bird, a principled liberal. She should throw in the towel right now and admit she got rolled by a Chi-town shyster.

[Finny]

She sounds like that rare bird, a principled liberal.

True, on one way, I suppose ... but no one of principle could delude themselves the way this woman does. Maybe "principled liberal" is an oxymoron.

[fightinJAG]

She sounds like that rare bird, a principled liberal. She should throw in the towel right now and admit she got rolled by a Chi-town shyster.

I have to say, this author's analysis is in a whole other league than the usual ragging on the President by the Left. This is way beyond simple "he's not liberal enough." This is he's not competent enough. This is he's really, really not competent enough, to the point where he may set back the party (Dems) and the nation.

Dayum.

[okie01]

Oh puhleeze, this poor woman. She sounds like that rare bird, a principled liberal. She should throw in the towel right now and admit she got rolled by a Chi-town shyster.

"Principled?" So long as she gets what she wants, maybe.

But, like the rest of the left's heavy thinkers, Walsh refuses to come to grips with the real problem: They elected an incompetent.

A "transcendent" incompetent, perhaps. But incompetent, nonetheless.