To: rabscuttle385
Is it better for a political party to be pragmatic & achieve power — or to remain an ideologically pure movement & criticize from the sidelines?
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Is it better for a political party to be pragmatic & achieve power"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" MARK 8:36, NIV
12 posted on
06/13/2010 12:03:26 PM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Is it better for a political party to be pragmatic & achieve power or to remain an ideologically pure movement & criticize from the sidelines?If by pragmatic, you mean turning into a pale imitation of your opposition, then neither alternative is acceptable. You present a false dichotomy; the real task if you have governing principles that will work is to educate people about them, not to give in to their ignorance.
32 posted on
06/13/2010 12:13:43 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Is it better for a political party to be
A. pragmatic & achieve power or
B. to remain an ideologically pure movement & criticize from the sidelines? The answer is obviously A.
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
A friendly question. How does your question apply to the democrats and especially Obama’s gang?
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
A friendly question. How does your question apply to the democrats and especially Obama’s gang?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson